Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

We use ClamAV (actually libclamav) with HAVP to scan HTTP traffic as well as using it (clamd) to scan incoming email. Since so much traffic is moving to HTTPS, I would love to see some browser plugins -- in our case Firefox (ESR) -- for ClamAV. Something that used libclamav (ala HAVP) would be bes

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 11:07 +, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: > Hi there, > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Joel Esler wrote: > > > On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:22, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users ... wrote: > > > > > ... we really only use ClamAV to scan mail. I guess we're as > > > untypical of a Cl

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

On Mar 27, 2019, at 11:07, G.W. Haywood wrote: > On that day's numbers it looks like ClamAV is rejecting about 5% of > rejected mail. Here, in fifteen months, it's rejected _less_ than > 0.0002% (although I'll grant that both are likely poor statistics). Hello, fellow Loughborough graduate :) We

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

. HaywoodSubject: Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?Hi Everyone,Can you please try this link see if you can download the file as for us its not working: http://www.clamav.net/downloads/production/ClamAV-0.101.2.exewe are getting this message: This page isn’t workingwww.clamav.net is

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

Hi Everyone, Can you please try this link see if you can download the file as for us its not working: http://www.clamav.net/downloads/production/ClamAV-0.101.2.exe we are getting this message: This page isn’t working *www.clamav.net * is currently unable to handle this re

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

Hi there, On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Joel Esler wrote: On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:22, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users ... wrote: > ... we really only use ClamAV to scan mail. I guess we're as > untypical of a ClamAV user as you'll get. Actually, from what we understand, ClamAV is mostly used to scan ema

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

It's nice to hear that others are interested in the detection stats feature. It is a very high priority for us, though we have a couple other high priorities we're tackling first. We had hoped to re-implement it for 0.102. I'm still crossing my fingers that we can get it done, but we've lost a

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

> That’s super interesting. I’d be interested in what the > 6500 signatures were. Just for a real world “what are > you seeing” conversation. Any update on when ClamAV might be re-implementing the ability to submit detection stats? ___ clamav-users m

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

Have emailed you off-list. Graeme From: Joel Esler (jesler) Sent: 25 March 2019 22:08 To: ClamAV users ML Cc: Graeme Fowler Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only? That’s super interesting. I’d be interested in what the 6500

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

egard, and I'm thankful ClamAV exists for > many reasons, not least its extensibility! > > Graeme > > > From: clamav-users on behalf of Joel > Esler (jesler) via clamav-users > Sent: 25 March 2019 19:36 > To: ClamAV users ML > Cc: Joel Esler (jesler); G.W. Haywood >

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

easons, not least its extensibility! Graeme From: clamav-users on behalf of Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users Sent: 25 March 2019 19:36 To: ClamAV users ML Cc: Joel Esler (jesler); G.W. Haywood Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only? Actually, from what

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

> People have been doing that kind of thing for years, I'm not sure how > much it's increasing. Most of the time it seems to me they don't know > why they're doing it nor even, if there is something in there to find, > how likely it is that a ClamAV scan will find it. I know people have been scan

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

> Subject: [External] Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only? > > Actually, from what we understand, ClamAV is mostly used to scan email. > > Sent from my  iPhone > > > On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:22, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users > > wrote: > > >

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

Actually, from what we understand, ClamAV is mostly used to scan email. Sent from my  iPhone > On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:22, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users > wrote: > > Although we share files with Windows platforms we really > only use ClamAV to scan mail. I guess we're as untypical of a ClamA

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

Hi there, On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, J.R. wrote: ... I've seen an increasing amount of people posting about their non-windows platforms that are scanning their *entire* system ... People have been doing that kind of thing for years, I'm not sure how much it's increasing. Most of the time it seems

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

Our signatures cover all platforms. Sorry, can’t type on watch. :) Sent from my  iPad > On Mar 25, 2019, at 08:20, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users > wrote: > > Our signature is cover all platforms. > > Sent from my Apple Watch > >> On Mar 25, 2019, at 08:13, J.R. via clamav-users >>

Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

Our signature is cover all platforms. Sent from my Apple Watch On Mar 25, 2019, at 08:13, J.R. via clamav-users wrote: > I keep thinking about this from time to time, but keep forgetting to > post before I get sidetracked doing something else... > > Are the ClamAV default signature files gear

[clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

I keep thinking about this from time to time, but keep forgetting to post before I get sidetracked doing something else... Are the ClamAV default signature files geared towards Windows executables / malware / documents / (generic spam)? Or do they cover other platforms as well? Reason I'm asking,