Hi there,
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Orion Poplawski via clamav-users wrote:
clamav is reporting BC.Gif.Exploit.Agent-1425366.Agent for a gif inside of the
gdk-pixbuf2 tarball. I've tried adding it do our local whitelist.ign2 file,
but that doesn't appear to take effect. Any way to ignore this
uly 21, 2021 12:35 PM
> To: eric-l...@truenet.com; ClamAV users ML us...@lists.clamav.net>
> Cc: Orion Poplawski
> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Cannot ignore BC.Gif.Exploit.Agent-
> 1425366.Agent
>
> Looks like "BC.Gif.Exploit-1425366" finally did the trick. Tha
n
> Poplawski via clamav-users
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 1:48 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Cc: Orion Poplawski
> Subject: [clamav-users] Cannot ignore BC.Gif.Exploit.Agent-1425366.Agent
>
> clamav is reporting BC.Gif.Exploit.Agent-1425366.Agent for a gif inside of th
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 1:48 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Cc: Orion Poplawski
Subject: [clamav-users] Cannot ignore BC.Gif.Exploit.Agent-1425366.Agent
clamav is reporting BC.Gif.Exploit.Agent-1425366.Agent for a gif inside of the
gdk-pixbuf2 tarball. I've tried adding it do our local
clamav is reporting BC.Gif.Exploit.Agent-1425366.Agent for a gif inside of the
gdk-pixbuf2 tarball. I've tried adding it do our local whitelist.ign2 file,
but that doesn't appear to take effect. Any way to ignore this definition?
Thanks,
Orion
--
Orion Poplawski
IT Systems Manager
