On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 10/19/2011 10:00 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I have a fedora15 system with spamassassin-3.3.2 and clamav-0.97.2,
and also using the clamav-unofficial-sigs. and I've just realized the
score for catching one of the listed
Hi,
I have a fedora15 system with spamassassin-3.3.2 and clamav-0.97.2,
and also using the clamav-unofficial-sigs. and I've just realized the
score for catching one of the listed domains is only 0.2.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.444 tagged_above=-100 required=5
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Alex mysqlstud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a fedora15 system with spamassassin-3.3.2 and clamav-0.97.2,
and also using the clamav-unofficial-sigs. and I've just realized the
score for catching one of the listed domains is only 0.2.
X-Spam-Status: No,
Hi,
I have a fedora15 system with spamassassin-3.3.2 and clamav-0.97.2,
and also using the clamav-unofficial-sigs. and I've just realized the
score for catching one of the listed domains is only 0.2.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.444 tagged_above=-100 required=5
On 10/19/2011 10:00 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I have a fedora15 system with spamassassin-3.3.2 and clamav-0.97.2,
and also using the clamav-unofficial-sigs. and I've just realized the
score for catching one of the listed domains is only 0.2.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.444 tagged_above=-100