.
- Original Message -
From: "Ronan Lucio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Re: Lirva
> Thank you very much Tomasz,
>
> It seems working fine to me, too.
&
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:30:06PM -0600, Johan Kuuse wrote:
> >For the last 6 months, OAV database was updated _two_ times.
>
> Oops, thats bad.
Sorry, my fault - it was updated three times.
> BTW, how do you get notified about new viruses?
I'm subscribed to many services, but the most importa
.com/Download/virussig.html
If not, are you interested in such a script (I can offer it in Perl)?
Best Regards,
Johan Kuuse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Tomasz Kojm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:0
Thank you very much Tomasz,
It seems working fine to me, too.
Ronan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 13:07:43 +0100
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:02:01AM +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:19:27PM -0600, Johan Kuuse wrote:
> > > This means that the
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:55:12AM -0600, Johan Kuuse wrote:
> http://www.openantivirus.org/latest.php
> , is that project still running?
I've notified Rainer Link (OAV project leader) about that,
just after Winevar.a infections. For the last 6 months, OAV database
was updated _two_ times.
Best
So how do you get the signatures?
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:01:47AM -0600, Johan Kuuse wrote:
> BTW, how do you keep the "master database" up to date?
> When I have a look at
> http://www.antivirus.net/
> there are lots of non-commercial resources available.
> Do you use anyone of these?
Some of them are non-commercial, but they
an Kuuse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Tomasz Kojm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:07 AM
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Re: Lirva
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:02:01AM +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, J
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:02:01AM +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:19:27PM -0600, Johan Kuuse wrote:
> > This means that the virus is newer than the virus database.
> > Anyone on this list is able to advice the virus database maintainer about
> > this issue?
>
> The databas
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:19:27PM -0600, Johan Kuuse wrote:
> This means that the virus is newer than the virus database.
> Anyone on this list is able to advice the virus database maintainer about
> this issue?
The database has been updated, do you have the virus sample to check it ?
Best rega
Hello,
I also experienced this Lirva problem today (2003-01-08).
The database for ClamAV-0.54 was up to date, but it didn't catch the Lirva
virus (the Windows box receiving the mail running Norton did detect the
virus).
When I checked the database at
http://clamav.elektrapro.com/database/
it says
11 matches
Mail list logo
