Re: [clamav-users] Signature wildcard usage

2010-12-31 Thread Bill Landry
On 12/31/2010 1:02 AM, Henrik K wrote: On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:18:40PM -0800, Bill Landry wrote: Still wondering if this support will be added or not? You know the answer already.. open a bug (or reopen the old). Maybe then you will get some answer. Someday. ;-) I was just hoping for a

Re: [clamav-users] Signature wildcard usage

2010-12-31 Thread Henrik K
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:18:40PM -0800, Bill Landry wrote: > > Still wondering if this support will be added or not? You know the answer already.. open a bug (or reopen the old). Maybe then you will get some answer. Someday. ;-) ___ Help us build a c

Re: [clamav-users] Signature wildcard usage

2010-12-30 Thread Bill Landry
On 12/23/2010 3:58 PM, Bill Landry wrote: On 12/23/2010 1:57 PM, Henrik K wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:28:31PM +0200, Török Edwin wrote: On 2010-12-23 23:20, Bill Landry wrote: On 12/20/2010 9:34 AM, Bill Landry wrote: On 12/20/2010 2:04 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:31:

Re: [clamav-users] Signature wildcard usage

2010-12-23 Thread Bill Landry
On 12/23/2010 1:57 PM, Henrik K wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:28:31PM +0200, Török Edwin wrote: On 2010-12-23 23:20, Bill Landry wrote: On 12/20/2010 9:34 AM, Bill Landry wrote: On 12/20/2010 2:04 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:31:43 -0800 Bill Landry wrote: I've been doi

Re: [clamav-users] Signature wildcard usage

2010-12-23 Thread Henrik K
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:28:31PM +0200, Török Edwin wrote: > On 2010-12-23 23:20, Bill Landry wrote: > > On 12/20/2010 9:34 AM, Bill Landry wrote: > >> On 12/20/2010 2:04 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > >>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:31:43 -0800 Bill Landry wrote: > I've been doing some testing with so

Re: [clamav-users] Signature wildcard usage

2010-12-23 Thread Török Edwin
On 2010-12-23 23:20, Bill Landry wrote: > On 12/20/2010 9:34 AM, Bill Landry wrote: >> On 12/20/2010 2:04 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote: >>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:31:43 -0800 Bill Landry wrote: I've been doing some testing with some of the new signature wildcards, in particular: • (B)

Re: [clamav-users] Signature wildcard usage

2010-12-23 Thread Bill Landry
On 12/20/2010 9:34 AM, Bill Landry wrote: On 12/20/2010 2:04 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:31:43 -0800 Bill Landry wrote: I've been doing some testing with some of the new signature wildcards, in particular: • (B) Match word boundary (including file boundaries). • (L) Match CR,

Re: [clamav-users] Signature wildcard usage

2010-12-20 Thread Bill Landry
On 12/20/2010 2:04 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:31:43 -0800 Bill Landry wrote: I've been doing some testing with some of the new signature wildcards, in particular: • (B) Match word boundary (including file boundaries). • (L) Match CR, CRLF or file boundaries. I've found that

Re: [clamav-users] Signature wildcard usage

2010-12-20 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:31:43 -0800 Bill Landry wrote: > I've been doing some testing with some of the new signature wildcards, > in particular: > > • (B) > Match word boundary (including file boundaries). > • (L) > Match CR, CRLF or file boundaries. > > I've found that both of these wildcards wo

[clamav-users] Signature wildcard usage

2010-12-19 Thread Bill Landry
I've been doing some testing with some of the new signature wildcards, in particular: • (B) Match word boundary (including file boundaries). • (L) Match CR, CRLF or file boundaries. I've found that both of these wildcards work when used singularly in any of the following combinations: SpamDo