#include // created 13/04/2016 19:33
> Please refer to the bug report at:
> https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11552
> for the patch to resolve the issue.
Wow, thanks for the quick solution :)
I've just tried the patch on my laptop and seems working fine, I do some
tests and I will
Please refer to the bug report at:
https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11552
for the patch to resolve the issue.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Kevin Lin wrote:
> ClamAV, in order to optimize the AC algorithm execution, runs the filetype
> signatures alongside
ClamAV, in order to optimize the AC algorithm execution, runs the
filetype signatures alongside the malware detection signatures. ClamAV
is set to immediately return after AC execution if a filetype
signature detection occurs. This unfortunately causes the engine to
skip PCRE signature execution.
Hi,
Thanks for the example. I've opened bug
https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11552 to track.
Thanks again,
Steve
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
Hi, kionez--
On Apr 13, 2016, at 8:11 AM, kionez wrote:
> I'm using it on my antispam server with Debian Jessie (with clamav
> 0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u2 and libpcre3 8.35-3.3+deb8u4 ) and also testing on my
> laptop with Arch linux (clamav 0.99.1-2 and pcre 8.38-3). I try to
>
#include // created 13/04/2016 16:37
> Hi,
>
> The first question is: Do you have pcre installed and was it found by
> ClamAV .\configure?
[cut]
Ops, I forgot to mention my system configuration.. sorry.
I'm using it on my antispam server with Debian Jessie (with clamav
0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u2
Hi,
The first question is: Do you have pcre installed and was it found by
ClamAV .\configure? You should see something like:
pcre: /usr
near the end of the ./configure output.
Steve
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV
Hi,
I'm going mad with a strange behaviour of clamav with custom yara rules.
I'm trying to match some nasty spam email, I decided to use yara for my
custom rules but i noticed a problem: if I use only string detect clamav
(either via clamscan or clamdscan) matches all the email (text +
headers)