Re: [clamav-users] negate part of signature

2015-11-02 Thread Dennis Peterson
Awesome news on the PCRE inclusion. Looking forward to that. dp On 10/29/15 4:13 PM, Alain Zidouemba wrote: FYI, PCRE support is coming in ClamAV 0.99. There is a release candidate here if you want to try it: http://www.clamav.net/downloads ___

Re: [clamav-users] negate part of signature

2015-10-30 Thread Steve Basford
On Fri, October 30, 2015 8:07 am, Deyan Chepishev wrote: > Hello, > > > Thank you for the answer. > > > There is probably something missing in the doc, because the signature is > not properly working with the current clamav release 0.98.7 > I confirm the same here... I think it was a bug that's

Re: [clamav-users] negate part of signature

2015-10-30 Thread Deyan Chepishev
Hello, Thank you for the answer. There is probably something missing in the doc, because the signature is not properly working with the current clamav release 0.98.7 I tried the following signature: testsig:0:*:!(6e6f74)62616466756e6374696f6e28 ___not___badfunction( If I sca

Re: [clamav-users] negate part of signature

2015-10-29 Thread Alain Zidouemba
Check out https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-devel/blob/master/docs/signatures.pdf, section 3.2.4. You should be able to write something like: !(not)badfunction( FYI, PCRE support is coming in ClamAV 0.99. There is a release candidate here if you want to try it: http://www.clamav.net/downloads

[clamav-users] negate part of signature

2015-10-29 Thread Deyan Chepishev
Hello, I have a signature, which matches bad things, but also is giving me a lot of false positives. The reason for this is, that the bad code is actually subset of the good code, which gives me the false positive. What I mean: I have signature, which matches for example: badfunction( howe