Am 27.09.18 um 11:04 schrieb Arnaud Jacques:
>> I then restarted the milter. Unfortunately, the email is still marked as
>> Spam. I thought that clamav-milter would simply ignore the file.
>>
>> X-Virus-Status: Infected (SecuriteInfo.com.Spam-4701.UNOFFICIAL)
>
> You can whitelist the signature
Am 27.09.18 um 01:53 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 27.09.18 um 00:34 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
>>> None of these says anything about what headers are added to the message.
>>>
>>> X-Virus-Status: and X-Virus-Scanned: may be added to all of the messages
>>>
Am 27.09.18 um 00:34 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
> None of these says anything about what headers are added to the message.
>
> X-Virus-Status: and X-Virus-Scanned: may be added to all of the messages
> regardless of how the milter is configured
no
the whole purpose of this header is to signal if t
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.09.18 um 11:04 schrieb Arnaud Jacques:
I then restarted the milter. Unfortunately, the email is still marked as
Spam. I thought that clamav-milter would simply ignore the file.
X-Virus-Status: Infected (SecuriteInfo.com.Spam-4701.UNOFFICIAL)
Y
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2018-09-27 10:36:
On 26.09.18 07:56, Jerry wrote:
I am running clamav version 0.100.1 on a FreeBSD 11.2 / amd64 machine.
I
also have the clamav-milter installed. My problem is that even though
I am
trying to whitelist some addresses, they get marked as Spam.
Hello Jerry,
I then restarted the milter. Unfortunately, the email is still marked as
Spam. I thought that clamav-milter would simply ignore the file.
X-Virus-Status: Infected (SecuriteInfo.com.Spam-4701.UNOFFICIAL)
You can whitelist the signature this way :
https://www.securiteinfo.com/servi
On 26.09.18 07:56, Jerry wrote:
I am running clamav version 0.100.1 on a FreeBSD 11.2 / amd64 machine. I
also have the clamav-milter installed. My problem is that even though I am
trying to whitelist some addresses, they get marked as Spam.
spam? clamav is s virus scanner, not spam scanner.
T
Good morning. I am an administrator using Clamav for Linux server security. ClamAV is updating the Daily Signatures (Daily Policy) daily.Here is the question.I am currently using commercial antivirus software as a server for Windows and perform integrity verification when downloading Daily Signatur
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.09.18 um 00:34 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
None of these says anything about what headers are added to the message.
X-Virus-Status: and X-Virus-Scanned: may be added to all of the messages
regardless of how the milter is configured
no
the whole pur
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:29:25 -0500 (CDT), Ted Hatfield stated:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Jerry wrote:
I am running clamav version 0.100.1 on a FreeBSD 11.2 / amd64 machine. I
also have the clamav-milter installed. My problem is that even though I am
trying to whit
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:29:25 -0500 (CDT), Ted Hatfield stated:
>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Jerry wrote:
>
>> I am running clamav version 0.100.1 on a FreeBSD 11.2 / amd64 machine. I
>> also have the clamav-milter installed. My problem is that even though I am
>> trying to whitelist some addresses, they g
Jerry,
A quick google search comes up with this information from 2009.
Whitelisting is NOT based on the mail header fields (To:, From:) but on
the "MAIL FROM" and "RCPT TO" SMTP commands.
Is perhaps the "MAIL FROM" not the same as the From address.
Look at the full headers of the message for
I am running clamav version 0.100.1 on a FreeBSD 11.2 / amd64 machine. I
also have the clamav-milter installed. My problem is that even though I am
trying to whitelist some addresses, they get marked as Spam.
This is an example of one such address: ☀ Puritan's Pride
I entered this into the whit
13 matches
Mail list logo
