> Hi All
>
> I have two servers both FreeBSD and on both of them clamd just keeps
> shutting down. The problem has only started recently they have been
> running clamav 0.85 with out problems until two days ago. I have
> upgraded to 0.86 with out any improvement. These are mx backups for
> each
* David Peall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 14:36]: wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I have two servers both FreeBSD and on both of them clamd just keeps
> > shutting down. The problem has only started recently they have been
> > running clamav 0.85 with out problems until two days ago. I have
> > upgr
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 13:21 +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > > head -n 2 /usr/src/lib/libz/zlib.h
> >
> > /* zlib.h -- interface of the 'zlib' general purpose
> compression library
> > version 1.1.3, July 9th, 1998
>
> You desperately need a newer version. Many zip files will crash that
> one.
Sorry this must be getting annoying.
The "Fixed" email has now gone through without any problem. This means
that what ever was in the header of the "messy" email had the ablility
to shutdown clamd. I would chalk this one up as a plausible DOS attack
the fact that I cannot provide you with a copy
* David Peall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 15:22]: wrote:
> Sorry this must be getting annoying.
>
> The "Fixed" email has now gone through without any problem. This means
> that what ever was in the header of the "messy" email had the ablility
> to shutdown clamd. I would chalk this one up as a
* David Peall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 15:13]: wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 13:21 +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > > > head -n 2 /usr/src/lib/libz/zlib.h
> > >
> > > /* zlib.h -- interface of the 'zlib' general purpose
> > compression library
> > > version 1.1.3, July 9th, 1998
> >
> > Y
> He's lied to you. Period.
Nope, after spying on the users mailbox the mail that was "fixed"
[-- Attachment #2: Focus on Storage.doc --]
[-- Type: application/msword, Encoding: base64, Size: 39K --]
> However, you and him need to reproduce the problem and document it
> properly then send the det
* David Peall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 16:04]: wrote:
> > He's lied to you. Period.
>
> Nope, after spying on the users mailbox the mail that was "fixed"
> [-- Attachment #2: Focus on Storage.doc --]
> [-- Type: application/msword, Encoding: base64, Size: 39K --]
>
> > However, you and him n
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 at 16:18:15 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
[...]
> 4. Make an archive of both and send it to the developers. They have a
>separate list, but they do lurk here as well so you can place the
>files on a publicly accessible site somewhere and give them the link
>to do
