RE: [Clamav-users] Mail taking a *long* time to hit the list

2004-05-04 Thread Colin A. Bartlett
Michael St. Laurent Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 2:11 PM Wow. I posted a message to the list at 9:23 AM (PDT) and as of 11:06 AM (PDT) it *still* hasn't posted. I wonder if this one will do any better? The list has been slow for me too. Welcome to SourceForge. Used to happen all the time on

RE: [Clamav-users] Mail taking a *long* time to hit the list

2004-05-04 Thread Jim Maul
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael St. Laurent Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 5:11 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Mail taking a *long* time to hit the list Antony Stone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: [Clamav-users] Mail taking a *long* time to hit the list

2004-05-03 Thread Antony Stone
On Monday 03 May 2004 10:11 pm, Michael St. Laurent wrote: Antony Stone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 03 May 2004 7:10 pm, Michael St. Laurent wrote: Wow. I posted a message to the list at 9:23 AM (PDT) and as of 11:06 AM (PDT) it *still* hasn't posted. I wonder if this one

Re: [Clamav-users] Mail taking a *long* time to hit the list

2004-05-03 Thread Antony Stone
On Monday 03 May 2004 7:10 pm, Michael St. Laurent wrote: Wow. I posted a message to the list at 9:23 AM (PDT) and as of 11:06 AM (PDT) it *still* hasn't posted. I wonder if this one will do any better? You mean the one saying: According to http://sarc.com/ there are several variants of the

RE: [Clamav-users] Mail taking a *long* time to hit the list

2004-05-03 Thread Michael St. Laurent
Antony Stone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 03 May 2004 7:10 pm, Michael St. Laurent wrote: Wow. I posted a message to the list at 9:23 AM (PDT) and as of 11:06 AM (PDT) it *still* hasn't posted. I wonder if this one will do any better? You mean the one saying: According to