RE: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-31 Thread Spicer, Kevin
Noel Jones wrote: > At 05:46 PM 10/24/03, Walgamotte, David wrote: > >> I didn't have luck with amavisd-net mailscanner is the way to go ... > > Don't use MailScanner with postfix. MailScanner manipulates the > postfix queue in an unsupported manner and will cause loss of mail > without warning

RE: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-24 Thread Kevin Spicer
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 00:08, Noel Jones wrote: > At 05:46 PM 10/24/03, Walgamotte, David wrote: > > >I didn't have luck with amavisd-net mailscanner is the way to go ... > > Don't use MailScanner with postfix. MailScanner manipulates the postfix > queue in an unsupported manner and will cause l

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-24 Thread Rick Macdougall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read that clamav virus updates are not as good as other commercial products. I presume it's comparable to any of those expensive commercial products right? I presume you can also send notification emails to recipient that an email with virus attachment has been sent to

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-24 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 17:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I read that clamav virus updates are not as good as > other commercial products. I presume it's comparable > to any of those expensive commercial products right? I've generally got virus updates from clamav for major virus outbreaks before I

RE: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-24 Thread Noel Jones
At 05:46 PM 10/24/03, Walgamotte, David wrote: I didn't have luck with amavisd-net mailscanner is the way to go ... Don't use MailScanner with postfix. MailScanner manipulates the postfix queue in an unsupported manner and will cause loss of mail without warning or notice. I'm sure MailScanner

RE: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-24 Thread Walgamotte, David
Title: RE: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail I didn't have luck with amavisd-net mailscanner is the way to go ... -Original Message- From: Noel Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 5:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Clamav-

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-24 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 17:14, Noel Jones wrote: > At 04:03 PM 10/24/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Has anyone tried using the following or combination > >thereof? (postfix + clamav + clamdmail) Any suggestions > >for this? or any combination for my mail server? > > postfix + clamav + amavisd-ne

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-24 Thread dng
I read that clamav virus updates are not as good as other commercial products. I presume it's comparable to any of those expensive commercial products right? Just out of curiosity, how many percent of virus emails do you "actually" get rid of/filtered? I presume you can also send notification email

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-24 Thread Noel Jones
At 04:03 PM 10/24/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone tried using the following or combination thereof? (postfix + clamav + clamdmail) Any suggestions for this? or any combination for my mail server? postfix + clamav + amavisd-new is fast, flexible, and reliable. -- Noel Jones ---

RE: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-24 Thread Walgamotte, David
Title: RE: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail    I have found MailScanner , MailScanner.biz to work good with clam. I did this becuase I had many problems with the milter packages.  Kindest Regards,  David Walgamotte  SA, Wildnet -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix + clamav + clamdmail

2003-10-24 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 at 17:03:06 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello. I am new to this list and wanting to test > clamav for my server. > > I am looking for good linux antivirus packages > to scan all incoming and outgoing emails. I have a > Mandrake 9.0 box with postfix. > > Has anyone tried