Re: Why upgrading sucks

Once again, I meant to send my reply to the list originally... Eric Blake wrote: > > Brian Jones wrote: > > > > I had to share my pain so I hope someone else finds this funny. > > Tonight I updated to Red Hat 7.2 and afterwards applied the necessary > > updates as noted by Red Hat. Then I creat

Why upgrading sucks

I had to share my pain so I hope someone else finds this funny. Tonight I updated to Red Hat 7.2 and afterwards applied the necessary updates as noted by Red Hat. Then I created RPMs of the newest libtool, automake, and autoconf and installed those. After twiddling with the various files like up

Re: automake/libtool question

> "Brian" == Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brian> So, since I'm using automake 1.4 and libtool 1.3.5 does this Brian> mean I should try upgrading to automake 1.5 and libtool 1.4.2? Automake 1.5 has much better support for using source files in other directories. It still isn't per

automake/libtool question

I'm looking for a suggestion as to the best way to have some common source code to multiple libraries outside of the directory the library is made in. I've tried LIBADD with .lo files and had problems with libtool resolving that the source file x.c is the same even though the path to it is differ