Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Brian Jones
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've done a lot of AWT merging and some debugging recently. > > It turns out that the Gtk+ peers aren't really complete. For > instance, it isn't possible to make an AWT checkbox due to a missing > native method. Dialogs don't work. There are Gtk error

Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Aaron M. Renn
Tom Tromey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The AWT code itself is in so-so shape. Some stuff works, some stuff > doesn't. GridBagLayout is completely missing (nice project for > someone who wants a moderately complex task), as is most of the > post-1.1 code. We basically never use the tree lock, w

Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Paul Fisher
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:30:26PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > > It turns out that the Gtk+ peers aren't really complete. They are mostly complete. I never said that they were complete. > For instance, it isn't possible to make an AWT checkbox due to a > missing native method. This is odd. I

Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Paul" == Paul Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> For instance, it isn't possible to make an AWT checkbox due to a Tom> missing native method. Paul> This is odd. I seem to recall them working at one point. There are two different Checkbox peer implementations. One has the native me

anoncvs access

2002-01-30 Thread Jeffrey Morgan
Title: anoncvs access I just tried to access the anonymous cvs for the classpath project for the first time.  I received a "connection refused" error when attempting to login.  Any advice? Thanks -Jeff

RE: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Jeffrey Morgan
Title: RE: State of AWT I would be interested in helping on a limited basis with the GTK2 peers. > Various Red Hat people have been bugging me to port the peers to GTK > 2.  That's probably something that should be done. >

Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Stuart Ballard
Paul Fisher wrote: > > Various Red Hat people have been bugging me to port the peers to GTK > 2. That's probably something that should be done. Does GTK2 have a planned release date? Will it be released with GNOME2 or before? I'm curious because this is the second time I've seen "porting to gtk

RE: anoncvs access

2002-01-30 Thread Jeffrey Morgan
Title: anoncvs access Please disregard this last email.  I had a firewall problem.   -Jeff I just tried to access the anonymous cvs for the classpath project for the first time.  I received a "connection refused" error when attempting to login.  Any advice? Thanks -Jeff

Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Per Bothner
Stuart Ballard wrote: > Paul Fisher wrote: > >>Various Red Hat people have been bugging me to port the peers to GTK >>2. That's probably something that should be done. >> > > Does GTK2 have a planned release date? I don't know, but Gnome2 does. See http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/schedule/

Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Aaron" == Aaron M Renn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Aaron> I did not refer to the Sun implementation when I wrote the AWT Aaron> so I don't know what they did wrt tree lock but it is probably Aaron> something I just missed. Same with the libgcj code. Aaron> You'll find that GridBagLayout

RE: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Jeffrey Morgan
Title: RE: State of AWT Although GTK2 is still alpha (or is that beta) most of it is fairly stable.  I have been working with it for over a month porting java-gnome to GTK 2 and GNOME 2. I would also agree that it would seem to make more sense to target the newer version of the libraries. >

Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Yann Secq
Aaron M. Renn wrote: > >I am very glad to hear that the code basically runs. Hopefully we >can iterate this up to a working AWT in reasonably decent period of >time. > Hi, there has been some talk around the wonka-vm, but I didn't understand were it leads. I've checked their webpages and it is e

Re: gcj vs classpath merge status

2002-01-30 Thread Andrew Haley
Nic Ferrier writes: > As far as I can tell the Classpath/libgcj project is creating 3 > things: > > - a standard java source code base implementing the java libs > - native jni libs to implement the native parts of the libs > - native cni libs to implement the native parts of the libs for g

Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jeffrey> Although GTK2 is still alpha (or is that beta) most Jeffrey> of it is fairly stable. I have been working with it Jeffrey> for over a month porting java-gnome to GTK 2 and GNOME 2. Jeffrey> I would also agree that it would see

Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Yann" == Yann Secq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Yann> Hi, there has been some talk around the wonka-vm, but I didn't Yann> understand were it leads. I've checked their webpages and it is Yann> explicitely written that their licence is GPL compatible Yann> (http://wonka.acunia.com/licence.ht

java-gnome

2002-01-30 Thread Jeffrey Morgan
Java-gnome uses only JNI at this time. I must say that I have only begun to look at the classpath project so I cannot comment on how well java-gnome might fit your needs. I would be happy to work with you to explore the possibility of using java-gnome in your project. As for the GTK+ port of S

Re: State of AWT

2002-01-30 Thread Brian Jones
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "Yann" == Yann Secq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yann> Hi, there has been some talk around the wonka-vm, but I didn't > Yann> understand were it leads. I've checked their webpages and it is > Yann> explicitely written that their licence is GPL co