Re: gcj -bootclasspath doesn't work anymore?

Tom Tromey wrote: > Based on the code, the docs, and the email message for the original > patch, I'd say that only the `--' form was meant to work. Further, I > think the single `-' form can't work because it conflicts with the > global gcc `-b' option. Why? -bootclasspath doesn't conflict with

Re: gcj -bootclasspath doesn't work anymore?

> Maybe it is finally time to write a javac-like wrapper program that > interprets its arguments and invokes gcj? Thats what the Debian packages of gcc (gcj) do since some time. Its a little shell script. Perhaps we can use it. I have the file for gcj-3.2 attached. Of course the -bootpath thing

Re: gcj -bootclasspath doesn't work anymore?

> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> /usr/local/gcc33/bin/gcj -bootclasspath '' -classpath Mark> ..:../vm/current:.: -C -d . @classes Mark> gcj: couldn't run `/usr/local/gcc33/bin/ootclasspath-gcc-3.3': No such Mark> file or directory Mark> Was -bootclasspath with a si

Re: OT: GPL and jar file

Andreas Rueckert wrote: > Hi! > > I have a licensing question, that you might be able to answer: are 2 classes in > a jar file 'linked' in a GPL way? I mean, if class A is under GPL and I put it > in a jar file with class B, does it restrict the license of B to GPL? Or could > B still be closed s