Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just finished some commits (less than 10) to make gnujaxp compliant
with jaxp1.1 public API.
We still need to fix the build system (see [1]) and that's all for the
minor changes.
The major improvment would be to have an transform
Hi,
Although I don't have access yet to alpha.gnu.org to publish the release
I have already created the 0.06 release tarball. I also tagged the CVS
tree as 'classpath-0_06-release'.
Current tarball can be found at:
http://www.klomp.org/mark/classpath/classpath-0.06.tar.gz
It has the following
Tom Tromey wrote:
Guilhem == Guilhem Lavaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guilhem Is it legally possible to get the rules returned by sun jdk's
Guilhem RuseBasedCollator.getRules() as it was done in Mauve ?
We would have to have RMS ask the FSF lawyer about this.
When I initially wrote
When should we expect 0.06 to be released?
John Leuner
___
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Mark Wielaard wrote:
My thinking was that the 0.0x releases are actually the pre-releases
while we work towards the first real GNU Classpath 1.0 release. People
can combine these pre-releases with their own VMs like gcj, kissme,
jikesRVM, Jaos, etc already do. But as long as we don't have at
5 matches
Mail list logo