Hi Sascha,
I completely agree and support your wishes! In fact, it would be nice if the
whole classpath and its documentation (javadoc) would be rebuilt on a
regular base and offered through the website.
I disagree on one point: testing doesn't slow down development. It may be
boring, but it is l
I am copying this to the jazzlib and classpath MLs to get some other
peoples' opinions on the Classpath license and how it should apply in a
case like this.
> My name is Dongku, Kim. I am a Japanese developer.
Hi
> My company makes commercial software. And, I work to make a module
> which makes
Hi,
On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 18:21, Sascha Brawer wrote:
> having read quite a bit of Classpath code, I'd like to express two wishes.
>
> First, please write more test cases. [..]
> Second, please write understandable documentation [...]
>
> In other words, I think that we really need to improve the
Hi,
On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 13:42, Patrik Reali wrote:
> I completely agree and support your wishes! In fact, it would be nice if the
> whole classpath and its documentation (javadoc) would be rebuilt on a
> regular base and offered through the website.
It has to be hosted on something different th
Hi,
Attached is a proposed split of java.lang.Runtime into a generic and VM
specific portion. It's not very exciting, just a bunch of native methods
that are moved (and one additional one).
If there are no comments I will commit (or should that wait until after
the 0.07 snapshot?)
BTW, Runtime.j
Hi,
On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 13:48, John Leuner wrote:
> I am copying this to the jazzlib and classpath MLs to get some other
> peoples' opinions on the Classpath license and how it should apply in a
> case like this.
Best is to direct such questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The FSF is the
official copy
I could host the Classpath documentation on the Jaos site, but only as a
temporary solution.
-Patrik
Patrik Reali
http://www.reali.ch/~patrik/
http://www.oberon.ethz.ch/jaos
___
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/m
Mark> Would someone be willing to try to set that up?
Mark> Could someone host the auto-generated documentation for now?
Last time I ran javadoc on classpath, I got tons and tons of errors.
Do we still get that?
I could set things up to post the pages to gcc.gnu.org nightly, just
like we do for t
> "Guilhem" == Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Guilhem> I am continuing the series of patches with that one, it adds two
Guilhem> methods to NumberFormat: getIntegerInstance() and
Guilhem> getIntegerInstance(Locale). They have to be implemented according to
Guilhem> Java 1.4.
Guilh
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 02:14, Dalibor Topic wrote:
The documentation and code don't match up now.
My Class Library book seems to indicate that it actually is instanceof,
thought in most cases your code comparing the actual Class seems more
correct.
It's the recommended way
Hi Raif,
Raif S. Naffah wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hello Dalibor,
(i'm cc-ing GNU Crypto)
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 10:51 am, Dalibor Topic wrote:
...
p.s. is there some kind of gnu-crypto.m4 file for automake to add a
--with-gnu-crypto option to it? I'd love having a s
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
Since I am not a GregorianCalendar expert I was hoping that someone
could review the following patch which I have in my tree from Ito
Kazumitsu. He and I wrote a couple of mauve test cases which are fixed
by this and I see no new failures. But people didn't seem to be
com
12 matches
Mail list logo
