hi,
this patch adapts JLayeredPane to the changes [EMAIL PROTECTED] recently
made to Container; notably he discovered that the drawing order in
container does not match sun's, so reversed it. re-reading the javadocs,
I see that I did not implement JLayeredPane correctly, and that its
documenta
A few of us (at least Dalibor, Grzegorz, Mark, and me) have talked a
bit on irc about other possibilities for collaboration in the free
Java. Classpath has been such a success that it seems logical that we
should start looking for ways to expand our sphere of collaboration.
One thing we talked ab
Begin Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Quadratic and cubic equations
Date Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2004 12:18 PM
From: Brian Gough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Sascha Brawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sas
> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> It looks to me like this is a test of exact java strictfp
Andrew> compliance. gcj fails, because it isn't strictfp compliant.
On top of that, to guarantee the same results everywhere we would need
to declare both the test case an
Tom Tromey writes:
> > "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andrew> It looks to me like this is a test of exact java strictfp
> Andrew> compliance. gcj fails, because it isn't strictfp compliant.
>
> On top of that, to guarantee the same results everywhere we would
Sascha Brawer writes:
> Begin Forwarded Message
> Subject: Re: Quadratic and cubic equations
> Date Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2004 3:17 PM
> From: Sascha Brawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Brian Gough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian Gough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:18:23
+:
>I suspect that GCJ on Intel uses the 80-bit extended-precision
>floating point registers (which are the gcc default, in C also) while
>the other virtual machines probably use strict double-precision.
>
>I don't know much abo
Begin Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Quadratic and cubic equations
Date Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2004 3:17 PM
From: Sascha Brawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Brian Gough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi
Hi,
Thanks for auditing the code!
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 23:20, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Chris" == Chris Burdess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Chris> I have some fixes to the build scripts. Do I need to post diffs here
> Chris> or is it ok to commit (inetlib being a separate module and all th
9 matches
Mail list logo