Re: JIT pluggability (ABI Issues)

2004-01-13 Thread Patrik Reali
Hi! What I meant was the order parameters are pushed on the stack. Please excuse my previous underspecified statement. As a side node, pushing parameters right-to-left makes the implementation of open parameter lists much simpler (maybe this is another reason C tends to use it?). -Patrik -

Re: [patch #2388] DefaultTableCellRenderer update

2004-01-13 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > /**/ > [patch #2388] Latest Modifications: > > Changes by: > Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 'Date: > Mon 01/12/04 at 20:21 (GMT) > > What

Re: JIT pluggability (ABI Issues)

2004-01-13 Thread Chris Gray
On Monday 12 January 2004 21:28, Patrik Reali wrote: > * class layout (do we really need this? I guess the fields are allocated in > the row as they are declared) Some VMs may group all reference fields together, or try to "pack" fields smaller than 16 bits (boolean, byte, short, char). -- Chri

Re: JIT pluggability (ABI Issues)

2004-01-13 Thread shudo
From: Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Monday 12 January 2004 21:28, Patrik Reali wrote: > > * class layout (do we really need this? I guess the fields are allocated in > > the row as they are declared) > > Some VMs may group all reference fields together, or try to "pack" fields > smaller than

Re: JIT pluggability (ABI Issues)

2004-01-13 Thread Sascha Brawer
CG = Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PR = Patrik Reali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PR> * class layout (do we really need this? I guess the fields are PR> allocated in the row as they are declared) CG> Some VMs may group all reference fields together, or try to CG> "pack" fields smaller than