Re: gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Handler update

2004-04-20 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 09:24, Guilhem Lavaux wrote: > Apparently the special parseURL implementation in > gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Handler is not required anymore and even > broken according to mauve test gnu.testlet.java.net.URL.URLTest. If we > replace it using GCJ implementation (attached)

RE: gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Handler update

2004-04-20 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Hi, Thanks Jeroen ! If noone is against I'm checking in this changes now. Cheers, Guilhem. On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 15:32, Jeroen Frijters wrote: > Guilhem Lavaux wrote: > > Apparently the special parseURL implementation in > > gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Handler is not required anymore and even >

Re: Http headers

2004-04-20 Thread Michael Koch
Am Dienstag, 20. April 2004 16:40 schrieb Guilhem Lavaux: > Michael Koch wrote: > >Am Dienstag, 20. April 2004 09:15 schrieb Guilhem Lavaux: > >>Hi, > >> > >>If you try the mauve test URLConnection/Http you may notice there > >> is failure due to an unknown header "server" which should be > >> "Ser

Re: java.net.URL authority/userInfo

2004-04-20 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Michael Koch wrote: Am Dienstag, 20. April 2004 09:19 schrieb Guilhem Lavaux: Hi, Here is a patch for URL.java and URLStreamHandler.java to implement support for authority and cleanup userInfo handling. I have updated a small testcase in mauve for authority and there does not seem to be any re

Re: Http headers

2004-04-20 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Michael Koch wrote: Am Dienstag, 20. April 2004 09:15 schrieb Guilhem Lavaux: Hi, If you try the mauve test URLConnection/Http you may notice there is failure due to an unknown header "server" which should be "Server". Apparently to make the search throught header fields independent from the c

Re: alternative to java

2004-04-20 Thread Sascha Brawer
Several people wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > [Java is a trap; we should avoid it; alternatives?] Many of the developers who work on "escaping the Java trap" met at this year's FOSDEM in Brussels. Mark Wielaard and I gave a talk, describing the motivation and current state of GNU Classpath and the

RE: java.net.URL authority/userInfo

2004-04-20 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Guilhem Lavaux wrote: > Here is a patch for URL.java and URLStreamHandler.java to implement > support for authority and cleanup userInfo handling. I have updated a > small testcase in mauve for authority and there does not seem > to be any regression. Please review. Looks good and this fixes a pr

Re: gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Handler update

2004-04-20 Thread Michael Koch
Am Dienstag, 20. April 2004 09:24 schrieb Guilhem Lavaux: > Hi, > > Apparently the special parseURL implementation in > gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Handler is not required anymore and even > broken according to mauve test gnu.testlet.java.net.URL.URLTest. If > we replace it using GCJ implementation

RE: gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Handler update

2004-04-20 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Guilhem Lavaux wrote: > Apparently the special parseURL implementation in > gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Handler is not required anymore and even > broken according to mauve test gnu.testlet.java.net.URL.URLTest. If we > replace it using GCJ implementation (attached) 39 failures > are fixed and no r

Re: java.net.URL authority/userInfo

2004-04-20 Thread Michael Koch
Am Dienstag, 20. April 2004 09:19 schrieb Guilhem Lavaux: > Hi, > > Here is a patch for URL.java and URLStreamHandler.java to implement > support for authority and cleanup userInfo handling. I have updated a > small testcase in mauve for authority and there does not seem to be > any regression. Ple

Re: Http headers

2004-04-20 Thread Michael Koch
Am Dienstag, 20. April 2004 09:15 schrieb Guilhem Lavaux: > Hi, > > If you try the mauve test URLConnection/Http you may notice there is > failure due to an unknown header "server" which should be "Server". > Apparently to make the search throught header fields independent from > the case we have u

gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Handler update

2004-04-20 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Hi, Apparently the special parseURL implementation in gnu.java.net.protocol.file.Handler is not required anymore and even broken according to mauve test gnu.testlet.java.net.URL.URLTest. If we replace it using GCJ implementation (attached) 39 failures are fixed and no regression happens. So I sugg

java.net.URL authority/userInfo

2004-04-20 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Hi, Here is a patch for URL.java and URLStreamHandler.java to implement support for authority and cleanup userInfo handling. I have updated a small testcase in mauve for authority and there does not seem to be any regression. Please review. Cheers, Guilhem. ChangeLog entry: 2004-04-20 Guilhem

Http headers

2004-04-20 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Hi, If you try the mauve test URLConnection/Http you may notice there is failure due to an unknown header "server" which should be "Server". Apparently to make the search throught header fields independent from the case we have using toLowerCase for all header keys and values: this is not right. I