W liście z wto, 03-08-2004, godz. 07:29, Michael Koch pisze:
> Ingo: Now my question are you really using the TARGET_* system or is
> it only rotting around in GNU classpath ? I really wonder if some
> AUTOCONF macros would be more helpful for you ?
I personally have never had a positive experi
Hi,
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 10:27, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I guess as long as we're stuck with C90 we can't use inline.
> Am I right in thinking that GNU Classpath targets C90?
Yes. More accurately would probably be that we try to support platforms
that still depend on gcc-2.95. This is not that unco
Hi,
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 07:24, Steven Augart wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >No, we should not silently give the user a crippled AWT.
> >
> This makes sense, in general.
>
> However, it would be really really nice if the version checks happened
> first. It would be even nicer if several ve
Hi,
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 11:56, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > As it is a Classpath's file, I'm forwarding this mail here. I've added a
> > small amount of lines for win32 at the top but it is not related.
>
> Sounds OK to me. It's bad programming style to depend on includes in
> other included file
Hi,
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 20:18, Aaron M. Renn wrote:
> Hello, all. I'm traveling to Amsterdam on business for the next few
> weeks and wondered if any Classpath hackers were in the vicinity. I
> really have not gotten a chance to meet most of the folks here, and
> would love to do so if possibl
Hi,
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 21:14, Sven de Marothy wrote:
> Just one suggestion: I'm (hopefully) going to be done with Area before
> the end of the month, and the remaining Arc2D stuff (and whatever else
> is left in geom.*) should be pretty trivial to do. So instead of making
> a bunch of small com
6 matches
Mail list logo
