Re: Target native layer

2004-08-12 Thread Dr. Torsten Rupp
Dear Michael, Wouldnt it be better to call it posix (note: no captial letter) as it currently supports Linux, *BSD, AIX ... We can and should add Solaris too. With autoconf its really simple. Then AICAS can remove their own Solaris port totally and we have a clean non-redundant codebase for

Re: Target native layer

2004-08-12 Thread Michael Koch
Am Donnerstag, 12. August 2004 12:16 schrieb Dr. Torsten Rupp: Dear Michael, Wouldnt it be better to call it posix (note: no captial letter) as it currently supports Linux, *BSD, AIX ... We can and should add Solaris too. With autoconf its really simple. Then AICAS can remove their own

Re: Target native layer

2004-08-12 Thread Michael Koch
Am Donnerstag, 12. August 2004 14:10 schrieb Dr. Torsten Rupp: I first wanted to avoid to offer here things in advance (otherwise I fear somebody will become upset if I can not do it in time, because of limitated manpower). Currently on the list is: Solaris, RTEMS, embOS and MinGW (Windows).

VMClassLoader

2004-08-12 Thread Tom Tromey
I notice that VMClassLoader still has this: * strongFor backward compatibility, this just ignores the protection * domain; that is the wrong behavior, and you should directly implement * this method natively if you can./strong I suggest we pick a flag day to switch this. In particular