Re: generics-branch

2005-01-18 Thread Stuart Ballard
That should be me saying "Doh!". Next time I'll check links when I type them from memory, even if I'm sure they're right ;) BTW, the nightly japicompat run including the comparison of generics-branch ran just fine (the classpath results are up to date and correct again), but Real Work prevented me

Re: [cp-patches] FOR APPROVAL: Removal of CVS tags from xml.sax

2005-01-18 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 00:26, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 22:44 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > The attached patch will remove the CVS Id tags present in the org. > > These are external sources for which it would be a good idea to keep > them completely the same if po

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management

2005-01-18 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 15:09 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > > > MX4J uses the Apache Software License, which, IIRC, is > > incompatible with the Classpath license. > > No its not incompatible with the Classpath license, its incompatible > with pure GPL. Which is indeed a problem because that mean

RE: generics-branch

2005-01-18 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 23:44, Jeroen Frijters wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 13:52, Stuart Ballard wrote: > > > (http://savannah.nongnu.org/project/japitools) > > The given link doesn't work; there is no such Savannah project. > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/ja

RE: generics-branch

2005-01-18 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Andrew John Hughes wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 13:52, Stuart Ballard wrote: > > (http://savannah.nongnu.org/project/japitools) > The given link doesn't work; there is no such Savannah project. http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/japitools Regards, Jeroen _

Re: generics-branch

2005-01-18 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 13:52, Stuart Ballard wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:21:39 +0100, Robert Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One could inspect genericism using reflection (e.g. > > Class.getTypeParameters(), Constructor.getGenerictypeParameters()). > > > > I would like to help adding ge

Re: AWT event dispatch thread question

2005-01-18 Thread graydon hoare
Jeroen Frijters wrote: I noticed the recent ClasspathToolkit changes to handle native events (nativeQueueEmpty, iterateNativeQueue and wakeNativeQueue) and I was wondering if it wouldn't be a better idea to put this stuff in EventDispatchThread (and defer construction of the EventDispatchThread to

AWT event dispatch thread question

2005-01-18 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Hi, I noticed the recent ClasspathToolkit changes to handle native events (nativeQueueEmpty, iterateNativeQueue and wakeNativeQueue) and I was wondering if it wouldn't be a better idea to put this stuff in EventDispatchThread (and defer construction of the EventDispatchThread to the Toolkit implem

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management

2005-01-18 Thread Nic Ferrier
If MX4J was dual licenced (maybe with the LGPL) I would help fix it. -- Nic Ferrier http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk ___ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management

2005-01-18 Thread Michael Koch
Hi, > MX4J uses the Apache Software License, which, IIRC, is > incompatible with the Classpath license. No its not incompatible with the Classpath license, its incompatible with pure GPL. Michael -- Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/ ___ Clas

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management

2005-01-18 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 09:58, Fernando Nasser wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: > > Am Samstag, 15. Januar 2005 18:59 schrieb Chris Burdess: > > > >>Ewout Prangsma wrote: > >> > >>>Are there any plans or activities to include the javax.management > >>>api in classpath? > >> > >>This API would normally b

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management

2005-01-18 Thread Fernando Nasser
Michael Koch wrote: Am Samstag, 15. Januar 2005 18:59 schrieb Chris Burdess: Ewout Prangsma wrote: Are there any plans or activities to include the javax.management api in classpath? This API would normally be developed under the auspices of the classpathx project. Nobody has got around to writing