Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Edwin, On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:42 +0100, Edwin Steiner wrote: > > Would it be possible to split out the mauve results pages? Or at least > > have a page with just a list of all common FAILS? > > Absolutely possible. Are there any specific details I should include in > such a page? If it is i

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-25 Thread Edwin Steiner
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:42:25PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > > "Edwin" == Edwin Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Edwin> Yes. All our machines are headless, so there is no X display. We are > Edwin> pondering to use a virtual X server, but we don't have a real > Edwin> solution right no

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-25 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Edwin" == Edwin Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Edwin> Yes. All our machines are headless, so there is no X display. We are Edwin> pondering to use a virtual X server, but we don't have a real Edwin> solution right now. Any ideas would be appreciated. Take a look at the batch_run scrip

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-25 Thread Edwin Steiner
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 07:35:46PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: [snip] > In principle the > mauve framework can support xfail files, although I don't believe > anybody used that for a long time. When all common failures are > inspected/identified correctly we could make a good xfails file so it is >

Re: FreeSWTTestApps page added to wiki

2005-11-25 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Roman" == Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Not implemented [need JDK 1.5 or greater] >> (java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: sun/awt/X11/XEmbeddedFrame) Roman> Bleah. It's not that this is a JDK1.5 feature which is missing, it is an Roman> unspecified class that is used by this pr

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Cacao Team, On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 12:33 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote: > http://www.cacaojvm.org/tgolem > > The "mauve report" is the comparison table. The "common" column shows > all PASSes and FAILs which are identical on all JVMs/architectures. > Each machine is listed with PASS, FAIL a

Re: Comparable in java.util.Calendar

2005-11-25 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Kendall" == Kendall Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kendall> I would like to implement Comparable in Kendall> java.util.Calendar.java. I fell that this is necessary for Kendall> compatibility with other JRE's. Note that this is already done on the generics branch. But I think it wouldn't

Re: Kerberos

2005-11-25 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jeff" == Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jeff> I imagine for now, it just means another command line switch to Jeff> configure to enable it if possible, and select MIT vs. Heimdal. This sounds good to me. We can always change or update this as needed later on. Tom

Re: Japi diffs for classpath

2005-11-25 Thread Stuart Ballard
FYI, I introduced a bug while trying to combine all the results for each branch into a single email. The bug is now fixed but in this email all but the last set of diffs were ignored. There may have been (probably were) diffs in jdk1x vs classpath that never showed up in this email. Stuart. On 11

mailing list troubles

2005-11-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi all, I tried to warn about a couple of issues with the mailing lists and savannah. But apparently I am one of the people trapped in some insane spam fighting scheme. Attached are the messages I sent from my normal email address. Unfortunately gnu.org currently doesn't accept email from that add