GNU classpath contribution question

2006-02-02 Thread Ken Larson
Hi, I have read the FAQ on contributing to GNU classpath, and I am still left with a question: Let's say for example standard Java defines some constant like FileFormat.BINARY. The Javadoc does not specify the value of this constant. I want to write a replacement for FileFormat, so I write

Re: Crypto/Security component in Bugzilla

2006-02-02 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 20:01 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Feb 1, 2006, at 7:52 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > > I thought this question was more about "security" in the sense of > > "bugs we know of in our security code", not "security flaws requiring > > a quick turnaround". > > Likewise. After read

Re: Problems running GTK-peers on Nokia-770

2006-02-02 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi, this is the case since if you redirect the x-traffic to another machine the application is "running" targetted on that xserver. I saw the following problems: * gdk_rgb returns as preferable color-depth 24bit whereas the xserver has no colormap assigned to 24-bit pixmaps. * repaint-issues, exp

Re: GNU classpath contribution question

2006-02-02 Thread Robert Schuster
Hi Ken, what you describe is called black box testing and is a legit mean. cya Robert Ken Larson wrote: > Hi, > > I have read the FAQ on contributing to GNU classpath, and I am still > left with a question: > > Let's say for example standard Java defines some constant like > FileFormat.BINARY.

Re: GNU classpath contribution question

2006-02-02 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Ken, On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:09 -0500, Ken Larson wrote: > System.out.println(FileFormat.BINARY) and run it against Sun's > implementation. I find out that the value is 1, and I put that in my > implementation. > > Is this legit for the purposes of contribuing to classpath? Normally publi

Re: GNU classpath contribution question

2006-02-02 Thread Per Bothner
Ken Larson wrote: Let's say for example standard Java defines some constant like FileFormat.BINARY. The Javadoc does not specify the value of this constant. Actually, it probably does: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/constant-values.html -- --Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Re: GNU classpath contribution question

2006-02-02 Thread Roman Kennke
Hi Ken, > Let's say for example standard Java defines some constant like > FileFormat.BINARY. The Javadoc does not specify the value of this > constant. I want to write a replacement for FileFormat, so I write a > program > > System.out.println(FileFormat.BINARY) and run it against Sun's >

Re: GNU classpath contribution question

2006-02-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 04:09:00PM -0500, Ken Larson wrote: > Hi, > > I have read the FAQ on contributing to GNU classpath, and I am still > left with a question: > > Let's say for example standard Java defines some constant like > FileFormat.BINARY. The Javadoc does not specify the value of t

Re: GNU classpath contribution question

2006-02-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Roman Kennke writes: > Hi Ken, > > > Let's say for example standard Java defines some constant like > > FileFormat.BINARY. The Javadoc does not specify the value of this > > constant. I want to write a replacement for FileFormat, so I write a > > program > > > > System.out.println(Fi

Re: New native layer

2006-02-02 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Casey Marshall wrote: On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:10 PM, David P Grove wrote: Jikes RVM also does m-to-n threading, so it's there's more than 1 VM that's whacky in this regard. The things we need to do are most likely different than what Kaffe needs to do, but having a chance to inject a VM call

[Bug awt/23931] ToolKit.createImage() throws unexpected IllegalArgumentException

2006-02-02 Thread multix at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from multix at gmail dot com 2006-02-02 16:11 --- Created an attachment (id=10772) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10772&action=view) gtk image patch this is a slightly revised version of the patch Mark proposed. It seems to well for me, a great improv

[Bug classpath/25812] gnu.regexp: support for (?<=X), (?X) wanted

2006-02-02 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-02 13:45 --- *** Bug 26075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- mark at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug classpath/22884] java.util.regex.Pattern doesn't understand (?s)

2006-02-02 Thread kaz at maczuka dot gcd dot org
--- Comment #5 from kaz at maczuka dot gcd dot org 2006-02-02 17:02 --- *** Bug 26075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- kaz at maczuka dot gcd dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---