hello John,
On Saturday 17 June 2006 00:35, John Pritchard wrote:
> Raif,
>
> thanks for your comments. the doc references have been linked,
thanks.
> the
> Init links have been changed to Doc ones,
yes but that does not help! linking @see references to anchors in the
class's javadoc does
--- Comment #2 from langel at redhat dot com 2006-06-16 14:52 ---
I agree. I have seen many problems with JTree. Maybe Audrius can look at this
again.
--
langel at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hendrich at informatik dot uni-hamburg dot de
2006-06-16 14:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=11680)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11680&action=view)
testcase
A simple testcase that embeds JTree inside a JSplitPane, with quite a few
nodes. Scrol
At the moment, the state of JTree is much worse than some time ago...
Run the free swing demo and select "tree demo".
1. clicking on the "switches" does nothing. It should expand/collapse the
corresponding subtree.
2. double-clicking an intermediate node correctly expands its subtree,
but
Raif,
thanks for your comments. the doc references have been linked, the
Init links have been changed to Doc ones, the property strings shortened
for faster hashing time, a couple new constructors added, and a main for
quick testing.
one question..
has it been your intention that all
5 matches
Mail list logo
