On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 06:22:19PM +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that:
>
> a) gcj has branched for 4.2 and the gcj-eclipse branch is moving
> to trunk
> b) there is another Free 1.5 compiler in the form of Sun's javac
> c) most VMs have support for at least some of the 1
Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Hi everyone,
Now that:
a) gcj has branched for 4.2 and the gcj-eclipse branch is moving
to trunk
b) there is another Free 1.5 compiler in the form of Sun's javac
c) most VMs have support for at least some of the 1.5 native stuff
I'd like to
Andrew John Hughes writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that:
>
> a) gcj has branched for 4.2 and the gcj-eclipse branch is moving
> to trunk
> b) there is another Free 1.5 compiler in the form of Sun's javac
> c) most VMs have support for at least some of the 1.5 native stuff
>
> I'd like t
[Mark Wielaard]
> And please do join some of us on irc.gnu.org in #classpath we might
> not have answers yet for all the wonderful things the future might
> bring, but we can at least have a little virtual party! :)
Yes, this is great news. I believe it calls for a free java developer
gathering
Il giorno ven, 17/11/2006 alle 12.41 -0800, Per Bothner ha scritto:
Hi Per, Hi Guilhem,
> Guilhem Lavaux wrote:
> > As a remainder I have made in 2004 a comparison between ICU and
> > java.text. I cannot find why I have at the time rejected a ICU binding
> > (except it is a huge machinery for so
5 matches
Mail list logo
