OpenJDK on Fedora

2007-05-09 Thread Mario Torre
Hello! I know this is not a list on OpenJDK :) I had some troubles in building the classes on Fedora Core 6 because it lacks openmotif, and fixed with this simple patch (that let us used lesstif), I've blogged about it so maybe some of you already knows, but I think it could be useful to share it

[Bug classpath/31882] New: VMPlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive truncates messages to the length of the first message received

2007-05-09 Thread robert dot dodier at gmail dot com
VMPlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive effectively truncates messages to the length of the first message received with a given DatagramPacket object. VMPlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive calls nativeReceive with incorrect length argument, namely the return value of DatagramPacket.getLength, which is not n

Re: GNU/Classpath & OpenJDK

2007-05-09 Thread Andrew Haley
Mario Torre writes: > Il giorno mer, 09/05/2007 alle 19.24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > > > Reading planet.classpath.org I see most people are already aware that most > > openjdk source code got released under the GPL at JavaOne. Other good news > > is that Dalibor go

Re: GNU/Classpath & OpenJDK

2007-05-09 Thread Mario Torre
Il giorno mer, 09/05/2007 alle 19.24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > Hi all, > > Reading planet.classpath.org I see most people are already aware that most > openjdk source code got released under the GPL at JavaOne. Other good news > is that Dalibor got on the initial governance board to h

Re: gcjwebplugin usefullness? 64 bit plugin?

2007-05-09 Thread Dâniel Fraga
On Sun, 6 May 2007 12:00:05 -0700 Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please file a bug report with the details, if you have them. > Try running appletviewer from the command line, perhaps you'll get a > nicer stack trace that way. Ok, I replied with more details. The only problem is

Re: gcjwebplugin usefullness? 64 bit plugin?

2007-05-09 Thread Dâniel Fraga
On Sun, 06 May 2007 20:08:35 +0200 Mario Torre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What fails? Can you file a bug report, provide stack traces of the > errors? Something that could help us to understand the problems and > try possible solutions. There is no guarantee that we will success, > maybe these a

GNU/Classpath & OpenJDK

2007-05-09 Thread mark
Hi all, Reading planet.classpath.org I see most people are already aware that most openjdk source code got released under the GPL at JavaOne. Other good news is that Dalibor got on the initial governance board to help shape the community. I already talked briefly with Eben Moglen (the legal couns

OpenJDK now completly OpenSource for download

2007-05-09 Thread theUser BL
At http://download.java.net/openjdk/40ec4ed263a6dfce13b8cf18fa046058/jdk7/ Sun published the complete JDK as OpenSource for download. There existing still a seperate package with Closed-Source-Plugins. But the goal is now, to replace the Closed-Source-Plugins by OpenSource things. And Sun helps

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-09 Thread Martin Schlienger
Yep thanks, I have understood the principle. But this was quite blurred how to provide the bytes to the bootstrap classLoader. We have to change not only VMClassLoader.loadClass signature but some of the VM function behavior. This might not be too complicated though, since we now have quite unders

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-09 Thread Andrew Haley
Martin Schlienger writes: > 2007/5/4, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yup. I'd suggest that instead of thinking of the solution in terms of > > writing a class loader, think about it in terms of writing some code > > that simply returns a byte[] that is the class contents. > > This is a

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-09 Thread Martin Schlienger
2007/5/4, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Yup. I'd suggest that instead of thinking of the solution in terms of writing a class loader, think about it in terms of writing some code that simply returns a byte[] that is the class contents. This is already done. Although this downloading code is