Hi,
from 0.97 onwards, classpath needs a working javah tool. Such a program
is provided by classpath' tools.zip but needs a working runtime and
class library first.
Earlier classpath releases had pre-generated header files and needed no
javah program.
Someone with less knowledge of the subtile ch
2008/5/13 Robert Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory declares:
>
> public static final String DATATYPEFACTORY_IMPLEMENTATION_CLASS =
> "gnu.xml.datatype.JAXPDatatypeFactory";
>
> The value is a fallback value which is treated as a class which is to be
> ins
Hi,
javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory declares:
public static final String DATATYPEFACTORY_IMPLEMENTATION_CLASS =
"gnu.xml.datatype.JAXPDatatypeFactory";
The value is a fallback value which is treated as a class which is to be
instantiated. Unfortunately this class does not exist.
Has this clas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The Java documentation only allows a '-' sign, not a '+' sign in
> Integer.parseInt and Integer.decode.
You've not been reading your mail. In particular, you haven't been
reading my replies. :-)
Andrew.
The Java documentation only allows a '-' sign, not a '+' sign in
Integer.parseInt and Integer.decode.
David R Cok
"Andrew John Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/12/2008 04:46 PM
To
"Nicolas Geoffray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
classpath@gnu.org
Subject
Re: Integer.parseI
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 09:45 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> That was my understanding. Apart from making the code messier,
> it doesn't do any harm, it's just difficult to maintain if we don't
> build it with
> the 1.4 options.
OK, I think it's a good idea.
- twisti
OneGuy wrote:
> I tried
>
> System.out.printf("Primes up to %8d %8d\n", m, count);
>
> and it worked fine on GCJ (as far as I remember), but someone else got the
> error
>
> 45: error: Can't find method 'printf(Ljava/lang/String;II)' in type
> 'java.io.PrintStream'.
>System.out.printf("
2008/5/13 Christian Thalinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 00:08 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I recently noticed that our VM classes had acquired code that uses the
> > 1.5 language features. As I believe we agreed to keep these 1.4-clean
> > with respe
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 00:08 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently noticed that our VM classes had acquired code that uses the
> 1.5 language features. As I believe we agreed to keep these 1.4-clean
> with respect to the language features, I've removed these. I assume
> we wis
9 matches
Mail list logo