Re: Patches waiting to be committed ...

2003-06-11 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2003 17:15 schrieb Stephen Crawley: > FYI: There are a number of Classpath patches on 'savannah' waiting > to be applied by someone with commit privilege. > > 1571 fix for java.math.BigDecimal.setScale() Not my area. > 1487 B

Re: Patches waiting to be committed ...

2003-06-11 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2003 17:15 schrieb Stephen Crawley: > FYI: There are a number of Classpath patches on 'savannah' waiting > to be applied by someone with commit privilege. > > 1571 fix for java.math.BigDecimal.setScale() > > 1487 Bad Permission

Re: /classpath/javax/swing/border CompoundBorder.java

2003-06-10 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 10. Juni 2003 19:17 schrieb Tom Tromey: > > "Sascha" == Sascha Brawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Sascha> Modified files: > Sascha> classpath/javax/swing/border: CompoundBorder.java > > Please write a ChangeLog entry for ever

Re: Classpath compilation error injavax/swing/plaf/BorderUIResource.java

2003-06-10 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 10. Juni 2003 19:05 schrieb Sascha Brawer: > Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Sascha Brawer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 10 Jun 2003: > > SB> While it does have the lacking constructors, I noticed so

Re: Classpath compilation error injavax/swing/plaf/BorderUIResource.java

2003-06-10 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 10. Juni 2003 16:59 schrieb Sascha Brawer: > Stephen Crawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 10 Jun 2003 > 23:38:45 > > +1000: > > 312. return new CompoundBorder (outsideBorder, > > insideBorder); <-

Re: Classpath compilation error injavax/swing/plaf/BorderUIResource.java

2003-06-10 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 10. Juni 2003 15:38 schrieb Stephen Crawley: > Michael wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 8. Juni 2003 17:00 schrieb Stephen Crawley: > > > Michael, > > > > > > Your recent changes included a change that gives compilation > > > errors in: > > > > > >

Re: AppletViewer

2003-06-09 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 9. Juni 2003 02:07 schrieb Brian Jones: > Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Am Freitag, 6. Juni 2003 16:27 schrieben Sie: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 15:44, Michael K

Re: Classpath compilation error injavax/swing/plaf/BorderUIResource.java

2003-06-08 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag, 8. Juni 2003 17:00 schrieb Stephen Crawley: > Michael, > > Your recent changes included a change that gives compilation errors > in: > > javax/swing/plaf/BorderUIResource.java > > Jikes says that CompoundBorder does not provide the constr

Re: AppletViewer

2003-06-06 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 6. Juni 2003 16:27 schrieben Sie: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 15:44, Michael Koch wrote: > > I have written a little appletviewer for libgcj. Its written in > > Java (;-)). Currently its only one file with two

Re: Problems creating configure file.

2003-06-06 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 6. Juni 2003 16:47 schrieb Ingo Prötel: > Thanks for your reply. > > I have looked for this package before, but I was only able to finde > libart_lgpl-devel-2.3.10-51 but this does not contain the > AM_PATH_LIBART macro. > > Do you have a p

Re: Problems creating configure file.

2003-06-06 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 6. Juni 2003 15:50 schrieb Ingo Prötel: > Hi, > > I'm trying to compile classpath from the CVS. Since there is no > configure I run aclocal, automake and autoconfigure. > > The aclocal terminates with the error: > aclocal: configure.in: 132

Re: isDirectory/isFile and links

2003-06-06 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Donnerstag, 5. Juni 2003 15:40 schrieb Dr. Torsten Rupp: > Hi, > > I yust got a little bit confused, because of the behaviour of > java.io.File.isDirectory()/java.io.File.isFile(). If the > requested filename is a link to a file/directory it seems >

Re: DatagramSocket patch

2003-05-30 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 30. Mai 2003 13:33 schrieb Jeroen Frijters: > Hi, > > Attached is a patch for a bug introduced with the fix on > 2003-04-30. > > Thanks. Thanks for reporting and writing the patch. I commited it. Please send a valid ChangeLog entry when w

Re: gcj 3.2.1

2003-02-25 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2003 05:04 schrieb Brian Jones: > Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Brian" == Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Brian> I've noticed I cannot compile CVS with gcj 3.2.1, is any > > other Brian> vers

Re: classpath ./ChangeLog java/lang/reflect/Proxy.j...

2002-12-23 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 23. Dezember 2002 15:07 schrieb Eric Blake: > Michael Koch wrote: > > CVSROOT:/cvsroot/classpath > > Module name:classpath > > Changes by: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/12/23 03:30:29 >

Re: java.nio.CharBuffer should implement java.lang.CharSequence

2002-11-23 Thread Michael Koch
Am Samstag, 23. November 2002 00:51 schrieb Jesse Rosenstock: > According to Sun's javadoc, the CharSequence methods in CharBuffer > should all deal with the remaining portion of the buffer, ie the > positions in [position(), limit()[. Commited. Can you please add a ChangeLog entry next time too

Re: java.nio.CharBuffer should implement java.lang.CharSequence

2002-11-22 Thread Michael Koch
Am Freitag, 22. November 2002 16:42 schrieb Brian Jones: > Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Doesn't this make it difficult to have a char buffer greater > > > than the maximum length of String? Is this what the API > > > recommends? > &

Re: java.nio.CharBuffer should implement java.lang.CharSequence

2002-11-22 Thread Michael Koch
Am Freitag, 22. November 2002 16:18 schrieb Brian Jones: > Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > --- gnu/java/nio/CharBufferImpl.java.orig Fri Nov 22 18:34:47 > > > 2002 +++ gnu/java/nio/CharBufferImpl.java Fri Nov 22 18:42:19 > > > 2002 @@ -170,

Re: java.nio.CharBuffer should implement java.lang.CharSequence

2002-11-22 Thread Michael Koch
RCS file: /cvsroot/classpath/classpath/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.731 diff -b -u -r1.731 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 22 Nov 2002 12:35:11 - 1.731 +++ ChangeLog 22 Nov 2002 13:05:20 - @@ -1,5 +1,19 @@ 2002-11-22 Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + * gnu/java/nio/CharBuffe

Re: Intel's patch submission...

2002-10-19 Thread Michael Koch
Am Samstag, 19. Oktober 2002 09:48 schrieb Mark Wielaard: > OK, no problem. There is enough to merge for everybody :) > Let me know when you are done or if the remaining java.net changes > do/don't interfere with your work: I just wanted to make sure that nobody does work others have already done

Re: Intel's patch submission...

2002-10-19 Thread Michael Koch
Am Freitag, 18. Oktober 2002 22:49 schrieb Mark Wielaard: > No new Mauve regressions (after fixing a small thing in file > Handler) and a few new PASSes in the URLTest. But this was mostly > optimization code. Will look at the rest of java.net next and then > the java.lang things. Please dont loo

Re: java.awt.dnd.*

2002-10-03 Thread Michael Koch
Am Donnerstag, 3. Oktober 2002 15:38 schrieb Sascha Brawer: > Hi Michael, > > in the ChangeLog entry of 2002-10-02, you mention source files in > java/ awt/dnd. > > Could it be that you forgot to "cvs add" them to the repository? Or > am I the only one who cannot get java/awt/dnd? Hmm, I have no

Patch: fixes some java.awt things

2002-09-25 Thread Michael Koch
=== RCS file: /cvsroot/classpath/classpath/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.611 diff -u -b -r1.611 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 25 Sep 2002 21:08:45 - 1.611 +++ ChangeLog 26 Sep 2002 05:26:22 - @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +2002-09-26 Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * java/awt/Choic

Re: AWT/Swing Support

2002-09-23 Thread Michael Koch
Am Montag, 23. September 2002 14:13 schrieb Wes Beebee: > I'm currently trying to get Classpath AWT/Swing > support > for an app. I'm compiling with FLEX. I've noticed > that > there's a lot missing in Classpath's AWT/Swing > directories. I wonder if it would be OK if I got > something working w

Re: jdiff.sh (BETA)

2002-09-21 Thread Michael Koch
> * Handles interfaces correctly ... Give me some help here; When > you have a public interface do all the methods-fields default to > "public"? I always explicitly declare them "public", but that's not > the case in eg. java.net.SocketOptions (is that a valid > declaration?) (Thanks Michael) I

Re: jdiff.sh

2002-09-20 Thread Michael Koch
Am Freitag, 20. September 2002 10:38 schrieb Giannis Georgalis: > Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think it would be very useful to have an > > automatically-generated API comparison page for Classpath-vs-JDK > > (and another for libgcj-vs-JDK). Anybody want to volunteer :-)? > > > > T

Re: jdiff.sh

2002-09-20 Thread Michael Koch
> I think it would be very useful to have an automatically-generated > API comparison page for Classpath-vs-JDK (and another for > libgcj-vs-JDK). Anybody want to volunteer :-)? I'm interested in this. I'm currently testing jdiff.sh. I think some things need to be fixed/implemented different. T

Re: gcj -bootclasspath doesn't work anymore?

2002-09-04 Thread Michael Koch
> Maybe it is finally time to write a javac-like wrapper program that > interprets its arguments and invokes gcj? Thats what the Debian packages of gcc (gcj) do since some time. Its a little shell script. Perhaps we can use it. I have the file for gcj-3.2 attached. Of course the -bootpath thing

Re: don't build java.util.logging?

2002-09-01 Thread Michael Koch
Am Montag, 2. September 2002 08:15 schrieb Mark Wielaard: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 01:46, Tom Tromey wrote: > > Today I tried building the Classpath CVS trunk with jikes. It failed > > building java.util.logging, since java.net.Socket doesn't have > > shutdownInput. My solution was to dis

<    1   2   3   4   5