below. Please consider checking it in. Thanks.
2007-04-19 Scott Gilbertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* gnu/java/awt/peer/swing/SwingComponentPeer.java
(handleEvent) Coalesce paint events.
* gnu/java/awt/peer/swing/SwingComponentPeer.java
(handleEvent) Coalesce paint
The xlib peers are specific to GCJ. Without GCJ, Classpath works on X using
GTK peers.
From: Philippe Laporte
To: classpath@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 6:21 AM
Subject: Lightweight AWT on X
Hi,
I've been googling around and saw some activity around libgcj for AWT
support based
Our original idea of changing GLightweightPeer and creating a new class,
GtkLightweightContainerPeer, has failed. Ultimately, we came up with a
simpler solution that fixes our problem- and does not break anything
else.
* What was changed:
- I applied Scott Gilbertson's patch, it is
Roman This patch also makes Toolkit.createComponent() return a
GLightweightPeer
Roman again. I got NullPointerExceptions with Swing applications otherwise
and
Roman think we should do like Sun here and provide a default impl for
Roman lightweight peers.
Roman ...
Roman(createComponent):
// New class:
class GtkLightweightContainerPeer
extends LightweightComponentPeer
implements ContainerPeer
{
// ContainerPeer-specific methods that used
// to be in GLightweightPeer
}
Are you saying you don't think we need class
gnu.java.awt.peer.LightweightContainerPeer?
I agree with Scott that we need to add a LightweightContainerPeer class.
I fixed up Toolkit, as well.
I also added the painting methods to GtkLightweightContainerPeer (those
that override ComponentPeer).
This is the updated ChangeLog. The newest patch is attached.
2006-02-22 Lillian
I wonder if you could have a look at this change, half of which I claim is
related:
http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/2006-February/000157.html
I originally submitted it for GCJ (hence the superfluous libjava/ on all
the paths), but it needs to go in Classpath before checking in
getClip().intersects(x, y, width, height);
}
- Original Message -
From: Scott Gilbertson
To: Lillian Angel
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [cp-patches] RFC: LightweightPeers reworked
I wonder if you could have a look at this change, half of which I claim is
related
I saw Roman already said these changes look OK. And as you suggested on
classpath-patches with respect to the LightweightPeer changes that
Lillian proposed it would be good if Lillian incorporated these changes
in her patch.
Thanks. That would be great.
+ public void repaint(long tm, int
in the Classpath 0.20 code.
Index: libjava/ChangeLog
from Scott Gilbertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* classpath/gnu/java/awt/peer/GLightweightPeer.java
(repaint): Pass event to parent.
* classpath/java/awt/Graphics.java (hitClip): Handle null clip.
Are these changes OK?
Justification
10 matches
Mail list logo
