--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 17:27 ---
This could be done via a Parser option.
Or perhaps a method so that certain options can
stop parsing..?
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-25 23:57 ---
Obsoleted by Roman's rewrite.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 00:11 ---
Fixed in cvs a while ago.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: classpath
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30593
___
Bug-classpath ma
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-05 16:10 ---
I tried this patch and it changes the error to something different:
Exception in thread "main" gnu.xml.dom.ls.DomLSException:
newsExtensionContent.xml:21
at gnu.xml.dom.ls.DomLSParser.getI
d at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31112
___
Bug-classpath mailing list
Bug-classpath@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-classpath
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-28 20:05 ---
Fix checked in.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
aited toString() method for example).
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-12
18:20 ---
Note that the Arrays methods have all been implemented.
--
Summary: [generics-branch] Missing methods in
java.util.Collec
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-19
17:31 ---
This was fixed by:
2005-08-19 Thomas Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* configure.ac: Generate native/jawt/Makefile.
* include/jawt.h: Import from libgcj.
* include/jaw
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
19:12 ---
Here is a test case that needs only libgcj:
abstract class B implements Runnable
{
public B() { }
abstract void run();
}
class C extends B
{
void run() { }
}
class A
{
private C c = null
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-24
22:33 ---
I'm testing a patch
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-25
02:10 ---
I checked this in to classpath.
It should be pulled over to gcj at the next import.
I'll look at putting this on the 4.0 branch as well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-classpath at gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24060
___
Bug-classpath mailing list
Bug-classpath@gnu.org
http
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-09-
tatus: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: classpath
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25374
__
swt clash
Product: classpath
Version: 0.20
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: awt
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.or
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-06 18:57 ---
Subject: Bug 24608
Author: tromey
Date: Fri Jan 6 18:57:36 2006
New Revision: 109422
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109422
Log:
2005-12-26 Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 16:02 ---
We probably won't directly incorporate Tritonus into the Classpath
release, though I don't think the idea has been fully discussed.
However we ought to work with Tritonus -- if I set it up here I can
play
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 16:09 ---
Note that in 1.5 there are some additions to java.net which might
be relevant to this.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 16:48 ---
Note that despite the commit, there are still some problems
in this area. See:
http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2006-February/000713.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 16:05 ---
Fix was checked in before 0.90.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-10 02:00 ---
I think we need to implement Field.isEnumConstant
to properly implement this.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-10 16:13 ---
This bug is gcj-specific.
I'm handling it.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-10 01:02 ---
I'll handle this.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assig
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-10 23:09 ---
Subject: Bug 25713
Author: tromey
Date: Fri Mar 10 23:09:23 2006
New Revision: 111949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111949
Log:
libjava
PR libgcj/25713:
* java/
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-10 23:10 ---
I checked in the fix.
The fix for the 4.1 branch could be back-ported to the 4.0
branch if someone wanted to do it.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 19:42 ---
"I wasn't sure string literals were automatically interned by all JVMs. If
this is in fact part of the langauge spec then this is a non issue."
Yeah, this is required by the language specification.
: classpath
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26851
___
Bug-classpath mailing list
Bug-classpath@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-07 15:02 ---
I'm a bit confused by this trace.
Perhaps we're calling setIndexed (see the code in makeCharIndexed)
on an object supplied by jedit?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-07 21:25 ---
Also, in AnnotationInvocationHandler, if the 'val' being returned
is an array, I think it should be cloned.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 20:24 ---
Fix checked in.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 20:32 ---
To me the code looks as though it still has this bug.
Presumably it can occur if the server closes the connection immediately
in response to a QUIT request.
Perhaps getResponse() ought to throw an IOException (or
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: classpath
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28664
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 16:34 ---
Fix checked in.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-23 16:01 ---
Forgot to mark as fixed last time around...
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-29 23:12 ---
I checked in a fix for annotation inheritance.
The other fix is pending introduction of Method.getDefaultValue, see
the classpath patch list.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-29 23:19 ---
I'm going to fix this by importing ASM.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-15 19:39 ---
I checked in my patch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
39 matches
Mail list logo