Re: [PATCH] ServerSocket.bind

2003-12-26 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi Michael, On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 18:34, Michael Koch wrote: After talking with guilhem on irc I got the problem and wrote the attached patch. I commited it to trunk already. Mark: Can you please commit this to classpath ? Now that you have commit access to classpath

Re: [PATCH] ServerSocket.bind

2003-12-26 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Michael, On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 18:34, Michael Koch wrote: > After talking with guilhem on irc I got the problem and wrote the > attached patch. I commited it to trunk already. > > Mark: Can you please commit this to classpath ? Now that you have commit access to classpath back yourself could

Re: [PATCH] ServerSocket.bind

2003-12-25 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 06:18:51PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 04:40:34PM +0100, Guilhem Lavaux wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It seems that nobody checks for null internet address in ServerSocket.bind. > > Here is a quick fix which should prevent calling a native method with a >

Re: [PATCH] ServerSocket.bind

2003-12-25 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 04:40:34PM +0100, Guilhem Lavaux wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that nobody checks for null internet address in ServerSocket.bind. > Here is a quick fix which should prevent calling a native method with a > null address argument. > > Regards, > Guilhem. > > ChangeLog: > > 20

[PATCH] ServerSocket.bind

2003-12-24 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Hi, It seems that nobody checks for null internet address in ServerSocket.bind. Here is a quick fix which should prevent calling a native method with a null address argument. Regards, Guilhem. ChangeLog: 2003-12-24 Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * java/net/ServerSocket.java (bind): Che