[no subject]

2014-10-07 Thread Anand
---Sent from Boxer | http://getboxer.com

Re: [Fwd: [kaffe] (no subject)] (jni.h)

2004-08-09 Thread Dalibor Topic
Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 11:56, Dalibor Topic wrote: As it is a Classpath's file, I'm forwarding this mail here. I've added a small amount of lines for win32 at the top but it is not related. Sounds OK to me. It's bad programming style to depend on includes in other included

Re: [Fwd: [kaffe] (no subject)] (jni.h)

2004-08-08 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 11:56, Dalibor Topic wrote: > > As it is a Classpath's file, I'm forwarding this mail here. I've added a > > small amount of lines for win32 at the top but it is not related. > > Sounds OK to me. It's bad programming style to depend on includes in > other included file

Re: [Fwd: [kaffe] (no subject)] (jni.h)

2004-08-05 Thread Dalibor Topic
Guilhem Lavaux wrote: Hi, As it is a Classpath's file, I'm forwarding this mail here. I've added a small amount of lines for win32 at the top but it is not related. Sounds OK to me. It's bad programming style to depend on includes in other included files, but if the single line change is required

[Fwd: [kaffe] (no subject)] (jni.h)

2004-08-03 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Hi, As it is a Classpath's file, I'm forwarding this mail here. I've added a small amount of lines for win32 at the top but it is not related. Cheers, Guilhem. --- Begin Message --- Cc; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Jan Schulz] Bug#262760: kaffe-dev: include/jni.h misses #include to compile eclip

Re: (no subject)

2004-07-29 Thread Dalibor Topic
Chris Pickett wrote: Valentin Chira wrote: Hi guys, I wanna try to port a Java VM to BeOS R5 but I have problem finding a VM that is full featured and easy to port. Can you help me with an advice? Hi Valentin, Try SableVM, it's highly portable if POSIX libraries are available. http://www.sablevm

Re: (no subject)

2004-07-28 Thread Chris Pickett
Valentin Chira wrote: Hi guys, I wanna try to port a Java VM to BeOS R5 but I have problem finding a VM that is full featured and easy to port. Can you help me with an advice? Hi Valentin, Try SableVM, it's highly portable if POSIX libraries are available. http://www.sablevm.org You can probably ge

Re: (no subject)

2004-07-28 Thread Archie Cobbs
Valentin Chira wrote: > Hi guys, I wanna try to port a Java VM to BeOS R5 but I have problem finding > a VM that is full featured and easy to port. Can you help me with an advice? Aside from any architecture-specific stuff (e.g., compare-and-swap implementation) what are the differences between Be

(no subject)

2004-07-28 Thread Valentin Chira
Hi guys, I wanna try to port a Java VM to BeOS R5 but I have problem finding a VM that is full featured and easy to port. Can you help me with an advice? regards, Valentin ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list

Re: (no subject)

2004-06-07 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 7. Juni 2004 13:48 schrieb Fabio Antonini: > Hi all > my name is Fabio Antonini and since the last week I'm evaluating > classpath with jamvm. I'm trying to cross-compile the > classpath/jamvm for a ppc405 from a i686 linux based host. When

(no subject)

2004-06-07 Thread Fabio Antonini
Hi all my name is Fabio Antonini and since the last week I'm evaluating classpath with jamvm. I'm trying to cross-compile the classpath/jamvm for a ppc405 from a i686 linux based host. When I run the jamvm on a simple hello world class file I receive the following message sh-2.04# /usr/local/

(no subject)

2003-09-25 Thread Andrew Haley
Stephen Crawley writes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Sun has a lot of lawyers, and they've been pretty aggressive than most > > about staking their claims on the linguistic turf (so they can sell it > > off). > > That's a rather twisted interpretation of Sun's use of trademarks, IMO. >

(no subject)

2002-10-09 Thread mahesh hr
Please don't send mail to my account from today onwards. __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ma

(no subject)

2002-03-22 Thread John Leuner
>From jleuner Fri Mar 22 19:21:31 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: jleuner@localhost Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 19:21:31 + Received: from bapli ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=jleuner) by bapli with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oUbS-0003k

Re: (no subject)

2001-08-31 Thread Brian Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi > I like to ask what JVM does classpath (CVS version) run with ? And how > do you configure the classpath and the JVM part ? I have try classpath > with Japhar but no luck, might the incorrect version I used. Try ORP 1.0.6, from http://sourceforge.net/projects/or

(no subject)

2001-08-22 Thread james . moey
Hi I like to ask what JVM does classpath (CVS version) run with ? And how do you configure the classpath and the JVM part ? I have try classpath with Japhar but no luck, might the incorrect version I used. thank you James ___ Classpath mailing list

Re: (no subject)

2001-01-03 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Brian" == cbj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brian> What you suggest sounds reasonable, but we need a list of the Brian> merged files already in gcj but not in classpath. Should we Brian> look at the gcj ChangeLog for this bit of information... the Brian> gcj team would have to explicitly s

(no subject)

2001-01-03 Thread cbj
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: (no subject) References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 03 Jan 2001 18:36:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: Bry

(no subject)

2001-01-03 Thread cbj
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Etienne M. Gagnon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: JNI CNI References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 03

(no subject)

2001-01-03 Thread cbj
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Artur Biesiadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ClassPath List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Classpath <-> gcj integration References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Br

Re: (no subject)

2001-01-03 Thread Bryce McKinlay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Further, I would rather that someone merge the implementations between > gcj and Classpath without regard to not having this or that > implemented in JNI (just CNI) and someone else can fill in JNI methods > as they come up. Even if it means breaking Classpath code tha

Re: (no subject)

2001-01-03 Thread Etienne M. Gagnon
Hi. > I've mentioned to Tom recently in private email that we should > probably just plan on having both CNI and JNI implementations in > Classpath. Kaffe and gcj can both use CNI, which makes JNI less > important going forward unless the SableVM, the Intel VM, or some > other VMs really like ha

(no subject)

2001-01-03 Thread cbj
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "ding hui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: I am interested in doing this job! References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 03 Jan 2001 09:06:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: "ding hui"'s message of "Wed, 03 Jan 2001 01:29:52"

(no subject)

2001-01-03 Thread cbj
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Artur Biesiadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ClassPath List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Classpath <-> gcj integration References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 03 Jan 2001 09:00:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: Artur Biesiadowski's message of

(no subject)

2000-11-16 Thread cbj
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: commit mail From: Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 16 Nov 2000 22:46:28 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I've redirected