Hi,
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 00:54, Brian Jones wrote:
> Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would certainly made this into three commits but would have just used
> > the given separate ChangeLog entries as shown since eacht entry is
> > clearly a group
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 08:05, Sascha Brawer wrote:
> > Here's a question about ChangeLog entries: Would it make sense to have
> > separate commits (and thus ChangeLog entries) for unrelated changes?
>
> Yes
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 08:05, Sascha Brawer wrote:
> Here's a question about ChangeLog entries: Would it make sense to have
> separate commits (and thus ChangeLog entries) for unrelated changes?
Yes for completely unrelated changes they should be committed seperately
(especially w
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 13 Aug 2003 01:05:31 +0200:
>I would really like everybody to follow the ChangeLog entry guidelines
>given in:
>http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/changelogs/guile-changelogs_3.html
Here's a question about ChangeLog entries: Wo
would like to see some of the ChangeLog entries of today:
> * java/awt/font/OpenType.java: Remove 'public static final'
> from OpenType tags, reverting the change of 2003-08-11. See
> Classpath discussion list of 2003-08-11.
This should just state:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 14. Juli 2003 09:46 schrieb Mark Wielaard:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 07:50, Michael Koch wrote:
> > * java/net/ServerSocket.java,
> > java/net/Socket.java: New versions from libgcj.
>
> If possible I would like to see the origi
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 07:50, Michael Koch wrote:
> * java/net/ServerSocket.java,
> java/net/Socket.java: New versions from libgcj.
If possible I would like to see the original libgcj ChangeLog entry when
things get merged back into Classpath from libgcj.
* java/ne
7 matches
Mail list logo