Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Cp-tools Javadoc Overview (was Re: Classpath API javadoc)

2002-05-05 Thread Julian Scheid
Original Message Subject: Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Cp-tools Javadoc Overview (was Re: ClasspathAPI javadoc) Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 20:04:27 +0200 From: Julian Scheid [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] References

Cp-tools Javadoc Overview (was Re: Classpath API javadoc)

2002-04-28 Thread Julian Scheid
Mark Wielaard wrote: I have not tried out the texidoclet for the Classpath Tools project yet. Source can be found http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/cp-tools/ I don't know if there has been an official release yet. Hi there, let me take this opportunity and give you a brief

Re: Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-28 Thread John Leuner
John I think it's a waste of all the effort that has gone into John commenting code, this resource should be made available and John people should be encouraged to use it. I agree. Also it will make RMS happy -- he likes it when free documentation is available so that people don't have to

Re: Cp-tools Javadoc Overview (was Re: Classpath API javadoc)

2002-04-28 Thread John Leuner
Mark Wielaard wrote: I have not tried out the texidoclet for the Classpath Tools project yet. Source can be found http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/cp-tools/ I don't know if there has been an official release yet. Hi there, let me take this opportunity and give you a brief

Re: Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-28 Thread Brian Jones
John Leuner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So what do we have to do to get a cron job set up somewhere to produce a daily javadoc run of the Classpath CVS code? Javadoc is a non-free tool, so installing and running it systematically on a FSF server is not possible. Using one of the free

Re: Cp-tools Javadoc Overview (was Re: Classpath API javadoc)

2002-04-28 Thread Julian Scheid
John Leuner wrote: - Gjdoc is an alternative javadoc driver. [...] How do we compile and run this driver? It's a bunch of Java classes, jikes path/*.java should do for now. I think the package also includes a dirty development Makefile. It's fairly command line compatible to Sun Javadoc,

Re: Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-28 Thread Phillip Morelock
of course not!!! :) At 27 April 2002, you wrote: Do you mind assigning copyright to the FSF for your documentation changes to Classpath? Brian Phillip Morelock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi I know I'm still new to this community, but since I'm going to focus my efforts on

Re: Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-28 Thread Julian Scheid
Brian Jones wrote: Javadoc is a non-free tool, so installing and running it systematically on a FSF server is not possible. Using one of the free alternatives that exist or waiting for a working gjdoc is necessary. Why not setup something like this using an early, perhaps incomplete version

Re: Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-28 Thread Julian Scheid
Nic Ferrier wrote: You don't need a GNU machine to do that. I will happily give you (or anyone else who will take on this task) an account on one of my machines (available over ADSL) where you can work on a daily update of the classpath source tree and where you can check out the gjdoc

Re: Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-27 Thread Tom Tromey
John == John Leuner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John I think it's a waste of all the effort that has gone into John commenting code, this resource should be made available and John people should be encouraged to use it. I agree. Also it will make RMS happy -- he likes it when free documentation

Re: Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-27 Thread Phillip Morelock
Hi I know I'm still new to this community, but since I'm going to focus my efforts on documentation because I have been ruled unclean ;) ... Resultant newbie question: is it still ok to use sun's javadoc tool or is there an appropriate free tool? How do they (or you) generally feel about

Re: Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-27 Thread Nic Ferrier
Phillip Morelock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi I know I'm still new to this community, but since I'm going to focus my efforts on documentation because I have been ruled unclean ;) ... Resultant newbie question: is it still ok to use sun's javadoc tool or is there an appropriate

Re: Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-27 Thread John Keiser
John Leuner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is an issue I have been meaning to raise lately, but never got round to. As part of the Classpath effort we are producing a large amount of javadoc documentation for the standard java class libraries. Unlike Sun, we don't have a reference page that

Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-26 Thread John Leuner
Thank you so much for your detailed reply. I have a couple of responses / sub-questions below: At 25 April 2002, you wrote: We do need more beginner doc. But we are still working hard on getting stable, usable versions of GCJ, Classpath, etc... out there and working. One of the

Re: Classpath API javadoc

2002-04-26 Thread Nic Ferrier
John Leuner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thank you so much for your detailed reply. I have a couple of responses / sub-questions below: At 25 April 2002, you wrote: We do need more beginner doc. But we are still working hard on getting stable, usable versions of GCJ, Classpath,