Re: GNU Classpath + JRVM

http://people.debian.org/~jewel//jikes/port_poc.html http://people.debian.org/~jewel//jikes/futurechanges.html java/lang/Integer.java - changed TYPE to use VM_Type java/lang/Double.java java/lang/Byte.java java/lang/Float.java java/lang/Short.java java/lang/Long.java

Re: GNU Classpath + JRVM -- Licensing

What is the status of this code you reference, Additional code was provided by Maria Butrico. The code she sent me is JRVM specific code that had been inserted into the IBM OTI class libraries ? This is essentially the code that calls methods in the VM_* classes. It doesn't

Re: GNU Classpath + JRVM -- Licensing

John Leuner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maria indicated to me that this code has exactly the same license as JRVM. Will we need to approach IBM about assigning copyright for this to the FSF? How will that affect (this same code) that they're using with the OTI libs? In the event

Re: GNU Classpath + JRVM

John Leuner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've created two documents: http://people.debian.org/~jewel//jikes/port_poc.html http://people.debian.org/~jewel//jikes/futurechanges.html describing my work on porting the Jikes RVM to GNU Classpath (or vice versa). The biggest issue is:

GNU Classpath + JRVM

I've created two documents: http://people.debian.org/~jewel//jikes/port_poc.html http://people.debian.org/~jewel//jikes/futurechanges.html describing my work on porting the Jikes RVM to GNU Classpath (or vice versa). The biggest issue is: Where do we put these JRVM specific changes in

GNU Classpath + JRVM -- JNI methods

Hello everyone (I've copied this message to the Classpath mailing list, but please reply on the jikes researchers list) I've been making good progress with my port of the GNU Classpath java class libraries ( http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/classpath.html ) to the Jikes RVM. Currently I