Re: Proposal for a response to SUN's announcement

2006-11-18 Thread Boris DuĊĦek
On Friday 17 November 2006 19:48, Nick Hill wrote: > is probably overdue. better late, than later (or even never :-)

Re: Proposal for a response to SUN's announcement

2006-11-17 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 11:09 -0800, David Daney wrote: > If an official response is deemed necessary, this one seems good. > > It is fairly content free, which I think is all you can have given the > constraints that it is a press release *and* from a moderatly large free > software project.

Re: Proposal for a response to SUN's announcement

2006-11-17 Thread David Daney
Nick Hill wrote: Following a discussion on #classpath IRC at around 6pm BST, we have arrived at a potential response to SUNs announcement of the impending release of SUN Java under the GPL. " We welcome Sun's announcement of the forthcoming release of Java under the GNU GPL. Sun's announcem

Re: Proposal for a response to SUN's announcement

2006-11-17 Thread Stuart Ballard
On 11/17/06, Nick Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "The reaction of many Classpath developers can be seen on planet.classpath.org." On IRC the sentence we came up with - but possibly after you drafted your mail - was "The planet.classpath.org website carries the reactions of many individual Clas

Proposal for a response to SUN's announcement

2006-11-17 Thread Nick Hill
Following a discussion on #classpath IRC at around 6pm BST, we have arrived at a potential response to SUNs announcement of the impending release of SUN Java under the GPL. " We welcome Sun's announcement of the forthcoming release of Java under the GNU GPL. Sun's announcement makes Java an e