+FAIL: java.util.prefs.PreferenceTest
+FAIL: org.omg.CORBA.ORB.parallelRunTest
+FAIL: java.awt.Choice.PaintTest
+FAIL: java.awt.Graphics.TestPaintGraphics
+FAIL: java.awt.Canvas.PaintTest
+FAIL: java.awt.TextField.PaintTest
+FAIL: java.awt.Container.LightweightContainer
+FAIL:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 12:58 -0400, Francis Kung wrote:
All of these pass for me as well, with one exception. In general I've
found robot / visual tests (as many of these are) are very finicky, and
require that you not be using your computer at all while they are running.
Here too, but
Hi list.
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 00:51 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Mauve regressions that should be fixed/investigated:
FAIL: gnu.java.security.jce.TestOfHttps
FAIL: java.net.URLConnection.getHeaderFields
(Seems to have to do something with how we handle the cacerts file)
FAIL:
Il giorno mer, 18/04/2007 alle 23.27 +0100, Paul Jenner ha scritto:
Hi list.
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 00:51 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Mauve regressions that should be fixed/investigated:
Comparing mauve results for 0.95-rc against 0.93, I also see:
+FAIL: java.util.prefs.PreferenceTest
Hi Mark.
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 00:51 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
A release branch has been created 'classpath-0_95-branch'
Can the latest build of the release candidate be made available for
download on builder.classpath.org as it was for the previous releases?
I think it would help those who
Hi Paul,
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:57 +0100, Paul Jenner wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 00:51 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
A release branch has been created 'classpath-0_95-branch'
Can the latest build of the release candidate be made available for
download on builder.classpath.org as it was
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 00:51 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
A release branch has been created 'classpath-0_95-branch'
I'll try to pick up any fixes made on the trunk, but if you feel some
patch is release critical please do CC me.
As with any release, I have a build failure on IRIX:
$
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:43 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
Il giorno mar, 10/04/2007 alle 23.47 +0200, Christian Thalinger ha
scritto:
From IRIX's manpage:
struct hostent *gethostbyname_r(const char *name, struct hostent *hent,
char *buffer, int bufsize, int *h_errnop);
How should we
Il giorno mer, 11/04/2007 alle 00.43 +0200, Mario Torre ha scritto:
I don't know if it help, but could you try the attached patch?
Ehm... this patch, I mean [1]...
notte! :)
Right... needed...!
Mario
[1] I got this from the Solaris 10 manpage, so I don't know if it apply
to IRIX too: The
Il giorno mer, 11/04/2007 alle 00.50 +0200, Christian Thalinger ha
scritto:
http://autoconf-archive.cryp.to/ax_func_which_gethostbyname_r.html
I think we should use that one.
Cool!
Ok so, I'll leave it for you then ;)
- twisti
Night!
Mario
--
Lima Software - http://www.limasoftware.net/
Hi,
FAIL: javax.swing.TransferHandler.createTransferable
(I thought this was fixed with Francis latest patch, but builder still
has trouble with it for some reason)
FAIL:
javax.swing.table.JTableHeader.AccessibleJTableHeader.AccessibleJTableHeaderEntry.getFont
(Not investigated yet)
I'll
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 23:49 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 00:51 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
FAIL: javax.swing.TransferHandler.createTransferable
(I thought this was fixed with Francis latest patch, but builder still
has trouble with it for some reason)
This has
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 17:48 +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Yeah, I wasn't sure about these two (I don't know very much about all
the xml apis, so I was being conservative and requesting to at least
remove the ones that I have personally seen cause problems), but if
libgcj removed them we
Mark Wielaard wrote:
A release branch has been created 'classpath-0_95-branch'
Shouldn't that have been 0.94?
I'll try to pick up any fixes made on the trunk, but if you feel some
patch is release critical please do CC me.
I'd really like to see the removal of the META-INF/services/*xml* go
Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
I'll try to pick up any fixes made on the trunk, but if you feel some
patch is release critical please do CC me.
I'd really like to see the removal of the META-INF/services/*xml* go
in. The inclusion of these resources breaks a lot of code (e.g.
On Apr 6, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Mauve regressions that should be fixed/investigated:
FAIL: gnu.java.security.jce.TestOfHttps
FAIL: java.net.URLConnection.getHeaderFields
(Seems to have to do something with how we handle the cacerts file)
Undoubtedly, yes. The best way to
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 08:03 +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
A release branch has been created 'classpath-0_95-branch'
Shouldn't that have been 0.94?
Yeah, the branch was created, then I realized my mistake. But the
revisionist history is that 0.95 is such a huge step
Il giorno sab, 07/04/2007 alle 12.39 +0200, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
Should these also not be there? The rule being if it is a service in the
core classes we default to in in code not through service files?
Then what about the prefs and sound ones?
I think that the preference is safe to be
Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 08:03 +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
I'd really like to see the removal of the META-INF/services/*xml* go
in.
Yes, that seems like a good idea. libgcj also did I believe that and
the fallbacks are in place. Besides the four service files you mention
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 17:48 +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Yeah, I wasn't sure about these two (I don't know very much about all
the xml apis, so I was being conservative and requesting to at least
remove the ones that I have personally seen cause problems), but if
libgcj removed them we
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 00:51 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
FAIL: javax.swing.TransferHandler.createTransferable
(I thought this was fixed with Francis latest patch, but builder still
has trouble with it for some reason)
This has nothing to do with the issue that Francis fixed (that is
properly
21 matches
Mail list logo
