Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Jeroen" == Jeroen Frijters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jeroen> Would anyone mind if I made the
> Jeroen> java.lang.String.CaseInsensitiveComparator inner class
> Jeroen> non-private (i.e. make it package accessible)?
>
> I'm sure it would be fine.
> But why do you
> "Jeroen" == Jeroen Frijters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeroen> Would anyone mind if I made the
Jeroen> java.lang.String.CaseInsensitiveComparator inner class
Jeroen> non-private (i.e. make it package accessible)?
I'm sure it would be fine.
But why do you need this?
Tom
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 13:26, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> Would anyone mind if I made the
> java.lang.String.CaseInsensitiveComparator inner class non-private (i.e.
> make it package accessible)?
I think this is OK. But make sure that you mark the class final so VMs
can still optimize it. And doc
3 matches
Mail list logo