On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:20 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andrew> All patches from Classpath 0.20 through to 2006/02/25
> Andrew> (specifically the tag generics-merge-20060225) to HEAD have
> Andrew> been merged to the generics bran
> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> All patches from Classpath 0.20 through to 2006/02/25
Andrew> (specifically the tag generics-merge-20060225) to HEAD have
Andrew> been merged to the generics branch.
The new tools directory apparently didn't make it to the b
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 22:12 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> All patches from Classpath 0.19 through to this afternoon (2005/11/27)
> to HEAD have been merged to the generics branch.
>
> Keep up the good work! :)
Same to you!
It is always a short announcement, but I know that with
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 00:45 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> All patches from the period 2005/09/20 to the early evening of 2005/11/01
> (GMT) to HEAD
> have been merged to the generics branch. A copy of the patch is
> available if required.
So cool! Lets see if we can also push ou
> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> Yet there is still a body of code on the generics branch that goes in
Andrew> the latter category (the valueOf() functions in the primitive classes
Andrew> for instance). Should this be merged across?
I think that is fine.
Hi all,
In JNode we're now using parts of the generics branch (e.g. for
java.util) and it seems to work just fine.
Great work!
For an listing of the status of the new 5.0 features that we now support
in JNode, see http://jnode.sourceforge.net/portal/node/623.
Ewout
Ewout Prangsma wrote:
Hi Andr
Hi Andrew and others,
Thanks for the comments.
The reason for my question is that in JNode, we have made the switch to
require 5.0 for our build process and we want to make the JNode VM more
and more 5.0 "compatible". The new LDC already works and I want to
start adding the 5.0 features. Enum's
> "Ewout" == Ewout Prangsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ewout> What is the current status of the generics branch?
To add a little to what Michael and Andrew said... we've added a
bunch of new classes to the branch, and also updated most of java.util
to use generics. There is still a lot of
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 11:38 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:55:14AM +0200, Ewout Prangsma wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > What is the current status of the generics branch?
>
> Not really usable yet.
>
Depends what you want to be use it for; I'd not be as pessimistic as to
s
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:55:14AM +0200, Ewout Prangsma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the current status of the generics branch?
Not really usable yet.
> Are bugfixes in the HEAD branch also included in the generics branch?
Yes, Andrew merges both branches on a regular basis.
Michael
--
Esc
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 04:21, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> That should be me saying "Doh!". Next time I'll check links when I
> type them from memory, even if I'm sure they're right ;)
>
Yes, but I should have spotted it, given that I use quite a few Savannah
projects (and run two of my own).
> BTW, t
Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 23:25 schrieb Andrew John Hughes:
> On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 13:52, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:21:39 +0100, Robert Schuster
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > One could inspect genericism using reflection (e.g.
> > > Class.getTypeParameters(),
> > > Co
That should be me saying "Doh!". Next time I'll check links when I
type them from memory, even if I'm sure they're right ;)
BTW, the nightly japicompat run including the comparison of
generics-branch ran just fine (the classpath results are up to date
and correct again), but Real Work prevented me
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 23:44, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 13:52, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> > > (http://savannah.nongnu.org/project/japitools)
> > The given link doesn't work; there is no such Savannah project.
>
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/ja
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 13:52, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> > (http://savannah.nongnu.org/project/japitools)
> The given link doesn't work; there is no such Savannah project.
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/japitools
Regards,
Jeroen
_
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 13:52, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:21:39 +0100, Robert Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One could inspect genericism using reflection (e.g.
> > Class.getTypeParameters(), Constructor.getGenerictypeParameters()).
> >
> > I would like to help adding ge
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:21:39 +0100, Robert Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One could inspect genericism using reflection (e.g.
> Class.getTypeParameters(), Constructor.getGenerictypeParameters()).
>
> I would like to help adding generics support to japitools. Just send me
> mail :-)
Jeroen
Hi.
JAPI tools is also pretty poor at showing up the changes, because,
of course, generics don't make it to bytecode.
One could inspect genericism using reflection (e.g.
Class.getTypeParameters(), Constructor.getGenerictypeParameters()).
I would like to help adding generics support to japitools.
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 17:08, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:01:59 +, Andrew John Hughes
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Great -- please let the list know how it goes. As I say, I haven't yet
> > tested it against a VM.
>
> I will, but I'll be building against vm/reference mys
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:01:59 +, Andrew John Hughes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great -- please let the list know how it goes. As I say, I haven't yet
> tested it against a VM.
I will, but I'll be building against vm/reference myself until the
branch is sunc to HEAD; I don't feel like regress
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 15:00, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:43:18 +, Andrew John Hughes
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With current CVS, I can now build the generics branch with ecj. What I
> > haven't tried yet is using this as the base for a VM. It will allow a
> > simple
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 13:48, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> I'm trying to get the generics branch to build with ecj on ikvm.
> Unfortunately I'm running into all sorts of problems.
>
> The first class of problems were nice and obvious: Changes were needed
> to IKVM's implementations of various java.lang.
22 matches
Mail list logo
