Re: Coding style etc

1999-12-28 Thread Anthony Green
Aaron wrote: > This is interesting. When does gjc plan to support inner classes? These > are absolutely needed to implement parts of the API. The work is going on right now. It won't be too much longer. AG -- Anthony Green Cygnus Solutions

Re: Coding style etc

1999-12-28 Thread Aaron M. Renn
Bryce McKinlay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > gcj cannot yet compile classpath from source code, because it cannot handle > inner or anonymous classes. Work on these and other "JDK-1.1" features is in > progress. In the mean time, gcj should be able to compile most of classpath with > the aid of an

Re: Coding style etc

1999-12-23 Thread John Watson
Brian Jones wrote: > > If no one else does, Paul can probably write a lisp reformatter which > works within emacs in batch mode to automatically reformat > everything. You can let emacs reformat files automatically with the attached emacs lisp. Put the attached code in your .emacs file, run so

Re: Coding style etc

1999-12-23 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If there is a code-formatting tool I don't see a reason why we >> shouldn't convert. We should make sure that nobody has pending >> changes to that class before converting them, though. Bryce> Great - I will experiment with the vari

Re: Coding style etc

1999-12-23 Thread Brian Jones
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes I would very much like to see one coding style use. > It would be nice if old code could be automatically reformatted. > And it would probably help the coders if there where syntax files > for this style for popular editors. If no one else does, Pa

Re: Coding style etc

1999-12-23 Thread Bryce McKinlay
Jochen Hoenicke wrote: > If there is a code-formatting tool I don't see a reason why we > shouldn't convert. We should make sure that nobody has pending > changes to that class before converting them, though. Great - I will experiment with the various code formatting tools and report back what

Re: Coding style etc

1999-12-23 Thread Bryce McKinlay
[ Resending this because it got lost last time? ] Jochen Hoenicke wrote: > If there is a code-formatting tool I don't see a reason why we > shouldn't convert. We should make sure that nobody has pending > changes to that class before converting them, though. Great - I will experiment with the

Re: Coding style etc

1999-12-22 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, Yes I would very much like to see one coding style use. It would be nice if old code could be automatically reformatted. And it would probably help the coders if there where syntax files for this style for popular editors. (P.S. Is the libgcj coding style written down somewere?) > Also, I n

Re: Coding style etc

1999-12-22 Thread Jochen Hoenicke
On Dec 22, Bryce McKinlay wrote: > One issue I'd like to raise is that of coding style. A nice feature of libgcj is > that the code is written fairly consistently, where as classpath varies widely > between classes and packages that were written by different authors. Although > there is no officia

Re: Coding style etc

1999-12-21 Thread Brian Jones
Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW - Will I need to sign another copyright assignment form in order to > contribute to classpath? I have already done an FSF one for gcc stuff, and a > Cygnus one for libgcj. Quick answer is it depends on what you signed. I believe the normal assign