On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 17:36 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mark> In the meantime, without disturbing existing documents or arrangements,
> Mark> we should refrain from distributing /new/ material from RFC sources
> Mark> without specific le
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> In the meantime, without disturbing existing documents or arrangements,
Mark> we should refrain from distributing /new/ material from RFC sources
Mark> without specific legal review.
Can we link to RFC URLs?
Tom
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 12:16 +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Hi Wolfgang,
> [...]
> > Yes, you can use the text of that RFC for the documentation of the
> > classes. If you look into our LICENSE file you see that the same is
> > already done for org/ietf/jgss using RFC 28
Hi Mark,
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
[...]
Yes, you can use the text of that RFC for the documentation of the
classes. If you look into our LICENSE file you see that the same is
already done for org/ietf/jgss using RFC 2853.
Good news for our documentation :-)
There are a couple of
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 20:03 +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> So the question comes to my mind if we also can use or
> maybe quote from the RFC documents in our javadocs.
> This would make documentation easier and as its the
> specification also correct in every detail.
>
> For your conv
5 matches
Mail list logo
