Re: classpath: build failure on m68k

2003-06-03 Thread Brian Jones
John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I checked what sh is on this machine: > > sh --version > GNU bash, version 2.05a.0(1)-release (m68k-unknown-linux-gnu) > Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > compared to: > > GNU bash, version 2.05b.0(1)-release (i386-pc-linux-gnu) > Copyri

Re: classpath: build failure on m68k

2003-06-03 Thread John Leuner
I checked what sh is on this machine: sh --version GNU bash, version 2.05a.0(1)-release (m68k-unknown-linux-gnu) Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. compared to: GNU bash, version 2.05b.0(1)-release (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. on my workstatio

Re: classpath: build failure on m68k

2003-06-01 Thread Brian Jones
John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I received a bug report from a Debian build daemon that could not build > classpath on the m68k architecture. > > Classpath builds on other architectures, so it's probably m68k specific. > > The problem seems to be with the build scripts however, can som

classpath: build failure on m68k

2003-05-31 Thread John Leuner
I received a bug report from a Debian build daemon that could not build classpath on the m68k architecture. Classpath builds on other architectures, so it's probably m68k specific. The problem seems to be with the build scripts however, can someone take a quick look at the output below and take a