Re: gcjwebplugin in Classpath

2008-12-23 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew John Hughes wrote: Dear all, What shall we do with the copy of gcjwebplugin that still remains in GNU Classpath? Given that development has since shifted to IcedTea, and then been abandoned altogether in favour of the new IcedTeaPlugin, I don't see any advantage in maintaining this

Re: gcjwebplugin in Classpath

2008-12-23 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2008/12/23 Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com: Andrew John Hughes wrote: Dear all, What shall we do with the copy of gcjwebplugin that still remains in GNU Classpath? Given that development has since shifted to IcedTea, and then been abandoned altogether in favour of the new IcedTeaPlugin, I

Re: gcjwebplugin in Classpath

2008-12-23 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Andrew, On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 01:39 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote: My preference would be to remove it before releasing 0.98. If we still want to ship a plugin with Classpath, we could possibly include IcedTeaPlugin. Thoughts? IMHO we shouldn't remove working code until there is a real

gcjwebplugin in Classpath

2008-12-22 Thread Andrew John Hughes
Dear all, What shall we do with the copy of gcjwebplugin that still remains in GNU Classpath? Given that development has since shifted to IcedTea, and then been abandoned altogether in favour of the new IcedTeaPlugin, I don't see any advantage in maintaining this in GNU Classpath. I do see a