Re: java.util.regex, gnu.regexp, ... How about oniguruma?

Hi, From: Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:15:30 +0100 > Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 15:29 +0100 schrieb Jeroen Frijters: > > While I'm certainly not against this option, I would like to point out > > that for some VMs using a native library isn't really a great soluti

RE: java.util.regex, gnu.regexp, ... How about oniguruma?

Hi there, Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 15:29 +0100 schrieb Jeroen Frijters: > Ito Kazumitsu wrote: > > I am playing with gnu.regexp these days and finding more and more > > to do before it becomes comparable with Sun's JDK. > > > > Although I will continue to make efforts on gnu.regexp, > > I am

RE: java.util.regex, gnu.regexp, ... How about oniguruma?

Ito Kazumitsu wrote: > I am playing with gnu.regexp these days and finding more and more > to do before it becomes comparable with Sun's JDK. > > Although I will continue to make efforts on gnu.regexp, > I am beginning to try another thing. > > I have found oniguruma, the regex library which is u

java.util.regex, gnu.regexp, ... How about oniguruma?

Hi, I am playing with gnu.regexp these days and finding more and more to do before it becomes comparable with Sun's JDK. Although I will continue to make efforts on gnu.regexp, I am beginning to try another thing. I have found oniguruma, the regex library which is used as a regex engine of Ruby,