Just wanted to report that I've been able to use Savannah for
accessing the Classpath repository in the method described there using
ssh. You have to register an ssh key and wait 6 hours.
I believe that it should be possible to submit patches to Classpath
via Savannah at this point. If it doe
Hi all,
If you were wondering why CVS doesn't work anymore or why the last
classpath 0.07 release hasn't gone up on the gnu.org servers this is the
reason. From http://savannah.gnu.org/statement.html:
On December 1st, 2003, we discovered that the "Savannah" syst
ved though. It will reduce the amount of spam we
need to moderate considerably and make the lists more snappy.
Also savannah has seen some updates.
- You can now use rsync to get a full copy of the CVS repostitory:
http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4142
- There is support fo
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 19:47 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> - All CVS services have now been put on cvs.savannah.gnu.org
> http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4168
>
> You will notice that last one when running CVS update. It will explain
> that you have to update t
Mark Wielaard wrote:
- All CVS services have now been put on cvs.savannah.gnu.org
http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4168
You will notice that last one when running CVS update. It will explain
that you have to update the Root of your CVS working directory. If you
the cvsutils
Hi Archie,
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 13:39 -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >>If you have
> >>the cvsutils installed then you can easily switch to the new CVS
> >>location by running this in your CVS working copy:
> >>cvschroot @cvs.savannah.gnu.org:/cvsroot/classpath
> >
> > And f
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Subversion support for savannah is planned in the future. And it might
make sense to adopt it then since other projects that rely on GNU
Classpath also use it and it makes merging easier. On the other hand
That would be great.
subversion is still a bit immature and not wi
Hi Archie,
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 09:31 -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > subversion is still a bit immature and not widely supported yet (for
> > example on builder.classpath.org we needed to install the latest
> > 1.3.0rc4 to get around some network timeout issues). CVS might
Mark Wielaard writes:
> Hi Archie,
>
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 13:39 -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> > Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > >>If you have
> > >>the cvsutils installed then you can easily switch to the new CVS
> > >>location by running this in your CVS working copy:
> > >>cvschroot @cvs.sava
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> You will notice that last one when running CVS update. It will explain
Mark> that you have to update the Root of your CVS working directory. If you
Mark> the cvsutils installed then you can easily switch to the new CVS
Mark> location
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> Or the fact
Mark> that you really need to setup an external diff command since the
Mark> built-in one is not capable enough.
? I haven't noticed this one.
Mark> Also importing an old CVS repository like all of GCC seems possible n
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 13:42 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Mark> Or the fact
> Mark> that you really need to setup an external diff command since the
> Mark> built-in one is not capable enough.
>
> ? I haven't noticed this one.
See the bottom of http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SvnSetup
Again, not a sh
Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For example, all of Apache is on a single Subversion server
> and they're up to revision #356264 (including imported CVS commits).
> We've used it at my real job for over a year with zero problems.
>
> As far as being "supported", not sure what you're ref
Nic Ferrier wrote:
Subversion seems to be another of those gnu vs apache things.
gnu people *tend* to prefer CVS (and to a lesser extent arch) because
they offer more centralized control. CVS is most popular because it is
very stable and well understood.
I think you're got things mixed up.
S
>
> > "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mark> Or the fact
> Mark> that you really need to setup an external diff command since the
> Mark> built-in one is not capable enough.
>
> ? I haven't noticed this one.
>
> Mark> Also importing an old CVS repository like all of
All,
I just got approval to post the zip files. Diff the trees in patch ID 64
and patch ID 65 to see each mod in each file. The Copyright Paperwork is in
the snail mail.
Gansha,
Will you supply the necessary change log to make it easier for the GNU
Classpath folks to integrate your work? Also,
Washburn, Weldon wrote:
>I just got approval to post the zip files. Diff the trees in patch ID 64
>and patch ID 65 to see each mod in each file.
>
I've made diffs and reposted separate patches for different packages
that were changed. I also looked through the collections changes, and
closed
Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Its unfortunate that some of the files you changed (eg
> java/io/ObjectInputStream) contain large blocks of reformatted
> code. This makes it very difficult to tell what the actual logic
> changes are, and reduces the chances that the patch will be
> i
18 matches
Mail list logo
