[cp-patches] Re: SimpleDateFormat (test please..)

2005-02-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 04:13 +0100, Sven de Marothy wrote: > This should fix a bug with DST settings when parsing dates. > > 2005-02-20 Sven de Marothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * java/text/SimpleDateFormat.java, > (parse): Set correct DST_OFFSET to the correct value. It fixes

[cp-patches] SimpleDateFormat (test please..)

2005-02-19 Thread Sven de Marothy
This should fix a bug with DST settings when parsing dates. (Explicitly setting DST_OFFSET will assume you are in DST regardless of the date. Therefore all non-DST dates were parsing wrong.) 2005-02-20 Sven de Marothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * java/text/SimpleDateFormat.java, (parse

Re: [cp-patches] [Patch] updated locale data from latest CLDR data

2005-02-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Michael, On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 23:19 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > I updated our locale date against recent CLDR data. Something transformed the attached bz2 file to plain/text for me. Any idea what/why it happened? Maybe the mailman list software did something 'clever'? Cheers, Mark signat

Re: [cp-patches] Small Throwable patch

2005-02-19 Thread Archie Cobbs
Mark Wielaard wrote: Seems sane to me. Is the instruction overhead really noticable/measurable to you? No, I haven't really measured it or anything... it's just something I noticed when looking at the C code that JC generates (because throwable contructors almost always get inlined). -Archie __

Re: [cp-patches] Small Throwable patch

2005-02-19 Thread Archie Cobbs
Michael Koch wrote: * java/lang/Throwable.java: simplify initializing cause in constructor I think it would be best to test the behavior of latest SUN JDK and then act on this. If it calles initCause() we need to do this too. If not we should not too. JDK 1.4.2 does not call initCause from the

Re: [cp-patches] Small Throwable patch

2005-02-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 08:32 -0600, Michael Koch wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 09:05:29PM -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote: > > I'm planning to commit this patch. The reason for it is that the > > logic of initCause() is unnecessary in the constructor, and represents > > unnecessary overhead which

[cp-patches] [Patch] javax.swing.JToggleButton

2005-02-19 Thread Michael Koch
Hi list, I just commited the attached patch to merge javax/swing/JToggleButton.java with GCC trunk CVS. Michael 2005-02-19 Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * javax/swing/JToggleButton.java: Removed empty line. Index: javax/swing/JToggleButton.java =

Re: [cp-patches] Small Throwable patch

2005-02-19 Thread Michael Koch
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 09:05:29PM -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote: > I'm planning to commit this patch. The reason for it is that the > logic of initCause() is unnecessary in the constructor, and represents > unnecessary overhead which we pay for every time a chained exception > is created. The effect i