Il giorno mer, 04/06/2008 alle 09.08 -0600, Tom Tromey ha scritto:
> Some of the indentation seems wrong to me, though I always find it a
> bit hard to tell due to diffs making tabs look weird.
I don't know if I say a popular thing or not, but please, expand your
tabs into spaces, it makes the wh
> "Robert" == Robert Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> The other tools are not affected by this change nor does this modify the
Robert> core getopt functionality (except that I made the 'programName' field
Robert> protected - was private).
I don't think we need this to be protected
Hi Robert,
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 10:33 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Can we also document each sun.* specific change somewhere? I still
> regard these as bugs, but not against either
> GNU Classpath or OpenJDK -- against the specification itself. If code
> is being relied upon by both class
2008/6/4 Robert Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> the attached patch refactors all of Classpath' code to use
> sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction instead of
> gnu.java.security.action.GetPropertyAction.
>
> Additionally the class in question is moved to its new package.
>
> While I don't lik
Robert Schuster wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Andrew Haley schrieb:
>>> What is the public equivalent for GetPropertyAction?
>> There isn't any need, is there?
> That depends. :)
>
>> It's just a wrapper for
>> (String) AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction() {
>> public jav
Hi.
Andrew Haley schrieb:
>> What is the public equivalent for GetPropertyAction?
>
> There isn't any need, is there?
That depends. :)
> It's just a wrapper for
> (String) AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction() {
> public java.lang.Object run() {
>
Hi,
the attached patch refactors all of Classpath' code to use
sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction instead of
gnu.java.security.action.GetPropertyAction.
Additionally the class in question is moved to its new package.
While I don't like the usage of a non-standard API as much as you I also
thin
Robert Schuster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrew John Hughes schrieb:
>>> 2008-06-03 Robert Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> * sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java: Functional copy
>>> of gnu/java/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Robert
>>>
>>
>> Er... fix the binar
Hi,
Andrew John Hughes schrieb:
>> 2008-06-03 Robert Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java: Functional copy
>> of gnu/java/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java.
>>
>> Regards
>> Robert
>>
>
>
> Er... fix the binary which is clearly broken by relyin
