Re: [cp-patches] FYI: GTK peers without X

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
Roman Kennke wrote: Hi Tom, - The code for fetching the frame extents now uses the (new?) GDK function gdk_window_get_frame_extents() rather than pulling the frame extents using the extended window property _NET_FRAME_EXTENTS. This will result in the wrong insets being calculated upon window re

Re: [cp-patches] FYI: GTK peers without X

2007-09-11 Thread Roman Kennke
Hi Tom, > > - The code for fetching the frame extents now uses the (new?) GDK > > function gdk_window_get_frame_extents() rather than pulling the frame > > extents using the extended window property _NET_FRAME_EXTENTS. > > This will result in the wrong insets being calculated upon window > reali

Re: [cp-patches] FYI: GTK peers without X

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
Roman Kennke wrote: Hi, This patch changes the GTK peers, so that they can be compiled and used on systems without X, for example on GTK for embedded or Windows systems. [...] - The code for fetching the frame extents now uses the (new?) GDK function gdk_window_get_frame_extents() rather than pu

[cp-patches] FYI: GTK peers without X

2007-09-11 Thread Roman Kennke
Hi, This patch changes the GTK peers, so that they can be compiled and used on systems without X, for example on GTK for embedded or Windows systems. In many places this only removes imports that are unused, there are only two notable changes: - The GdkRobotPeer now has #ifdef HAVE_XTEST for all o