Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 11:57 +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> > Note again that if you're a VM
> > maintainer and you use a custom version of
> > VMClassLoader, this is a breaking change and your version of
> > VMClassLoader will have to be updated as well (simply add
> an ext
Hi Jeroen,
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 12:27 +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> Oops. Wrong commit order. I've committed my other change as well, so we
> should be OK now.
Cool. Just updated again and things seems fine. Thanks.
I believe that with your and Andrew's work we are now synced for the VM
Class
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> It would be a good point to declare the vm classes interface
Mark> frozen for now and work towards a new snapshot release that
Mark> includes them.
Actually I would like to make one more change before 0.91. This one
is very simple,
On 26 Apr 2006, at 18:37, Tom Tromey wrote:
"Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> It would be a good point to declare the vm classes interface
Mark> frozen for now and work towards a new snapshot release that
Mark> includes them.
Actually I would like to make one more cha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mark> It would be a good point to declare the vm classes interface
> Mark> frozen for now and work towards a new snapshot release that
> Mark> includes them.
>
> Actually I would like to make one more change
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> I've appended it. Please comment, everybody. I'll check it in after
Tom> a few days if there is no objection.
I'm checking this in.
Tom
